Literature DB >> 21915580

Safety syringes and anti-needlestick devices in orthopaedic surgery.

Wilmer L Sibbitt1, Philip A Band, Lawrence G Kettwich, Cristina R Sibbitt, Lori J Sibbitt, Arthur D Bankhurst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS), The Joint Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act encourage the integration of safety-engineered devices to prevent needlestick injuries to health-care workers and patients. We hypothesized that safety syringes and needles could be used in outpatient orthopaedic injection and aspiration procedures.
METHODS: The study investigated the orthopaedic uses and procedural idiosyncrasies of safety-engineered devices, including (1) four safety needles (Eclipse, SafetyGlide, SurGuard, and Magellan), (2) a mechanical safety syringe (RPD), (3) two automatic retractable syringes (Integra, VanishPoint), (4) three manual retractable syringes (Procedur-SF, Baksnap, Invirosnap), and (5) three shielded syringes (Safety-Lok, Monoject, and Digitally Activated Shielded [DAS] Syringe). The devices were first tested ex vivo, and then 1300 devices were used for 425 subjects undergoing outpatient arthrocentesis, intra-articular injections, local anesthesia, aspiration biopsy, and ultrasound-guided procedures.
RESULTS: During the clinical observation, there were no accidental needlesticks (0 needlesticks per 1300 devices). Safety needles could be successfully used on a Luer syringe but were limited to ≤1.5 in (≤3.81 cm) in length and the shield could interfere with sonography. The mechanical safety syringes functioned well in all orthopaedic procedures. Automatic retractable syringes were too small for arthrocentesis of the knee, and the plunger blew out and prematurely collapsed with high-pressure injections. The manual retractable syringes and shielded syringes could be used with conventional needles for most orthopaedic procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The most effective and reliable safety devices for orthopaedic syringe procedures are shielded safety needles, mechanical syringes, manual retractable syringes, and shielded syringes, but not automatic retractable syringes. Even when adopting safety-engineered devices for an orthopaedic clinic, conventional syringes larger than 20 mL and conventional needles longer than 1.5 in (3.8 cm) are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21915580     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  3 in total

1.  Improvement in diagnostic and therapeutic arthrocentesis via constant compression.

Authors:  Tej B Bhavsar; Wilmer L Sibbitt; Philip A Band; Romy J Cabacungan; Timothy S Moore; Luis C Salayandia; Roderick A Fields; Scarlett K Kettwich; Luis P Roldan; N Suzanne Emil; Monthida Fangtham; Arthur D Bankhurst
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.

Authors:  Viraj K Reddy; Marie-Claude Lavoie; Jos H Verbeek; Manisha Pahwa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-14

3.  The Prevalence of Accidental Needle Stick Injury and their Reporting among Healthcare Workers in Orthopaedic Wards in General Hospital Melaka, Malaysia.

Authors:  A Bhardwaj; N Sivapathasundaram; Mf Yusof; Ah Minghat; Kmm Swe; Nk Sinha
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2014-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.