Literature DB >> 21915553

Perspectives in managing an implant recall: revision of 94 Durom Metasul acetabular components.

Vincent Y Ng1, Lindsay Arnott, Michael A McShane.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21915553     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Potential presence of metals in patients treated with metal-metal coupling prostheses for hip arthroplasty at 7 and 10 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Salvatore Gioitta Iachino; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Margherita Ferrante; Alfina Grasso; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-22

2.  Mechanical failure of metal-polyethylene sandwich liner in metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Authors:  Yasushi Oshima; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The effect of a manufacturer recall on the threshold to revise a metal-on-metal hip.

Authors:  Saket Tibrewal; Shiraz Sabah; Johann Henckel; Alister Hart
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Outcome of revision surgery for adverse local tissue reactions in patients with recalled total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Klemt; Sakkadech Limmahakhun; Georges Bounajem; Christopher M Melnic; Michael J Harvey; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Despite higher revision rate, MoM large-head THA offers better clinical scores than HR: 14-year results from a randomized controlled trial involving 48 patients.

Authors:  Lazaros Kostretzis; Martin Lavigne; Marc-Olivier Kiss; Maged Shahin; Janie Barry; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.