| Literature DB >> 21915230 |
Rand R Hafidh1, Ahmed S Abdulamir, Law Se Vern, Fatimah Abu Bakar, Faridah Abas, Fatemeh Jahanshiri, Zamberi Sekawi.
Abstract
The continuous escalation of resistant bacteria against a wide range of antibiotics necessitates discovering novel unconventional sources of antibiotics. B. oleracea L (red cabbage) is health-promoting food with proven anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities. However, it has not been researched adequately for its antimicrobial activity on potential resistant pathogens. The methanol crude extract of B. oleracea L. was investigated for a possible anti-microbial activity. The screening method was conducted using disc diffusion assay against 22 pathogenic bacteria and fungi. It was followed by evaluation of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Moreover, the antibacterial and the antifungal activities were confirmed using the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC), respectively. Remarkable, antibacterial activity was evident particularly against highly infectious microorganisms such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium as well as against human fungal pathogens, Trichophyton rubrum and Aspergillus terreus. Red cabbage is a rich source of phenolic compounds, anthocyanins being the most abundant class, which might explain its potent antimicrobial action. This extract is potentially novel for future antimicrobials, inexpensive, and readily available at a large scale for pharmaceutical companies for further investigation and processing.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial; anthocyanins.; antifungal; red cabbage
Year: 2011 PMID: 21915230 PMCID: PMC3171003 DOI: 10.2174/1874285801105010096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Microbiol J ISSN: 1874-2858
Antibacterial Activity of B.oleracea Methanol Extract by Disc diffusion Method
| Microorganisms | Inhibition Zone in Diameter (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial species | Number of strains | Negative control(MeOH | Positive control Streptomycin 10 µg/disc | ||
| 200 | 500 | ||||
| 2 (clinical isolate) | - | 11.5 ± 2.5 | - | 18 ± 0.4 | |
| 1 (ATCC 29247 stain) | - | 11 ± 1.3 | - | 17 ± 0.8 | |
| MRSA | 1 (clinical isolate) | - | 7 ± 0.5 | - | - |
| 1 (isolate) | 7 ± 0.3 | 17 ± 0.8 | - | 18 ± 1.1 | |
| 1(clinical isolate) | 12 ± 0.9 | 19 ± 2.1 | - | 16 ± 0.9 | |
| 1 (ATCC 25922 strain) | 15 ± 1.1 | 20 ± 1.0 | - | 11 ± 0.3 | |
| 1 (ATCC 35218 strain) | 15 ± 0.8 | 20 ± 1.7 | - | 16 ± 0.5 | |
| 1 (isolate) | 13 ± 1.2 | 17 ± 0.4 | - | 18 ± 0.8 | |
| 1 (clinical isolate) | 12 ± 0.6 | 19 ± 0.6 | - | 18 ± 1.0 | |
| 1 (clinical isolate) | 8 ± 0.5 | 15 ± 0.5 | - | 19 ± 0.7 | |
| 1 (ATCC 25241 strain) | 18 ± 1.3 | 18 ± 0.6 | - | 15 ± 0.5 | |
:MeOH: methanol
: (-) means no growth inhibition zone
Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus.
The MIC and MBC Values Against the Tested Bacteria by the Microdilution Method
| Bacterial Species | Number of Strains | MIC | MBC | MBC: MIC Ratio | AntibacterialMode | Positive Control Streptomycinmg/ml | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MBC | ||||||
| 2 (clinical isolate) | 100 | 400 | 4: 1 | Bacteristatic | 0.065 | 0.104 | |
| 1 (ATCC 29247 stain) | 100 | 400 | 4: 1 | Bacteristatic | 0.06 | 0.1 | |
| MRSA | 1 (clinical isolate) | 100 | 400 | 4: 1 | Bacteristatic | - | - |
| 1 (clinical isolate) | 100 | 200 | 2: 1 | Bactericidal | 0.04 | 0.08 | |
| 1(clinical isolate) | 100 | 200 | 2: 1 | Bactericidal | 0.05 | 0.1 | |
| 1 (ATCC 25922 strain) | 100 | 400 | 4: 1 | Bacteristatic | 0.045 | 0.09 | |
| 1 (ATCC 35218 strain) | 300 | 400 | 1.3: 1 | Bactericidal | 0.042 | 0.08 | |
| 1 (isolate) | 200 | 400 | 2: 1 | Bactericidal | 0.049 | 0.09 | |
| 1 (clinical isolate) | 100 | 200 | 2: 1 | Bactericidal | 0.047 | 0.08 | |
| 1 (clinical isolate) | 100 | 400 | 4: 1 | Bacteristatic | 0.05 | 0.085 | |
| 1 (ATCC 25241 strain) | 400 | 500 | 1.25: 1 | Bactericidal | 0.048 | 0.082 | |
: minimum inhibitory concentration
: minimum bactericidal concentration
: Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus
: (-) means no growth inhibition detected.
Antifungal Activity of B.oleracea Methanol Extract by Disc Diffusion Method
| Microorganisms | Inhibition Zone in Diameter (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fungal species | Number of strains | Negative control(MeOH | Positive control Amphotericin B (10µg/disc) | |||
| 200 | 500 | 700 | ||||
| 1 (ATCC 11990) | - | - | 8 ± 0.3 | - | 11 ± 0.5 | |
| 1 (ATCC 8137) | - | - | - | - | 10 ± 0.6 | |
| 1 isolate | - | - | - | - | 18 ± 1.0 | |
| 1 (ATCC strain 20542) | - | 10 | 11 ± 0.5 | - | 10 ± 0.8 | |
| 1 isolate | - | - | - | - | 8 ± 0.6 | |
| 1 isolate | - | - | - | - | 18 ± 1.0 | |
| 1 isolate | - | - | - | - | 19 ± 1.3 | |
| 1 isolate | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | 10 ± 0.7 | ||
| 1 (ATCC strain 74058) | - | - | - | - | - | |
MeOH: methanol
(-) means no growth inhibition zone.
The MIC and MFC Values Against the Tested Fungi by the Microdilution Method
| fungal Species | Number of Strains | MIC | MFC | MFC: MICRatio | AntifungalMode | Positive Control Amphotericin Bµg/ml | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MBC | ||||||
| 1 (ATCC 11990) | 75 | 300 | 4: 1 | Fungistatic | 2 | 3 | |
| 1 (ATCC strain 20542) | 75 | 150 | 2: 1 | Fungicidal | 2.8 | 3 | |
: minimum inhibitory concentration
: minimum fungicidal concentration.