Literature DB >> 21914507

Impact of measures to enhance the value of observational surveys in rare diseases: the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS).

Joe T R Clarke1, Roberto Giugliani, Gere Sunder-Plassmann, Perry M Elliott, Guillem Pintos-Morell, Elizabeth Hernberg-Ståhl, Maria Malmenäs, Michael Beck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disease registries are an important source of information on the natural history of rare diseases and the response to new therapies in a real-world setting. The value of the information, however, is directly related to the completeness of the data entered for each patient over the course of time. The Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS) is a Shire Human Genetic Therapies-sponsored, physician-directed registry of patients with Fabry disease, a rare, multisystem, lysosomal storage disorder, established in 2001. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: In 2005, measures were introduced to improve the completeness of data capture, including a focus on centers with 20 or more patients enrolled in the FOS, concentration on a limited number of core variables (i.e., serum creatinine, urinary protein, left ventricular mass [echocardiography], blood pressure [systolic and diastolic], pain, quality of life, and other Fabry disease-related signs and symptoms, as well as height and weight) and the introduction of Clinical Project Associates (CPAs) to facilitate data management by participating treatment centers.
RESULTS: An analysis of random samples of approximately 25% of patients in the registry in 2008 showed significant increases in data capture for most of the core variables examined.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the measures introduced in 2005 significantly improved the value of the information in the registry, which has contributed greatly to our understanding of patients' real-world experience with enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease.
Copyright © 2011 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21914507     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of observational studies in optimizing the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Michael J Mauro; Catherine Davis; Teresa Zyczynski; H Jean Khoury
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-02

Review 2.  Twenty years of the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS): insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry.

Authors:  Michael Beck; Uma Ramaswami; Elizabeth Hernberg-Ståhl; Derralynn A Hughes; Christoph Kampmann; Atul B Mehta; Kathleen Nicholls; Dau-Ming Niu; Guillem Pintos-Morell; Ricardo Reisin; Michael L West; Jörn Schenk; Christina Anagnostopoulou; Jaco Botha; Roberto Giugliani
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.303

3.  Big Data: transforming drug development and health policy decision making.

Authors:  Demissie Alemayehu; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2016-03-05

4.  European Adrenal Insufficiency Registry (EU-AIR): a comparative observational study of glucocorticoid replacement therapy.

Authors:  Bertil Ekman; David Fitts; Claudio Marelli; Robert D Murray; Marcus Quinkler; Pierre M J Zelissen
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.763

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.