Literature DB >> 21913995

Toxicity and elemental composition of particulate matter from outdoor and indoor air of elementary schools in Munich, Germany.

S Oeder1, S Dietrich, I Weichenmeier, W Schober, G Pusch, R A Jörres, R Schierl, D Nowak, H Fromme, H Behrendt, J T M Buters.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Outdoor particulate matter (PM(10)) is associated with detrimental health effects. However, individual PM(10) exposure occurs mostly indoors. We therefore compared the toxic effects of classroom, outdoor, and residential PM(10). Indoor and outdoor PM(10) was collected from six schools in Munich during teaching hours and in six homes. Particles were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Toxicity was evaluated in human primary keratinocytes, lung epithelial cells and after metabolic activation by several human cytochromes P450. We found that PM(10) concentrations during teaching hours were 5.6-times higher than outdoors (117 ± 48 μg/m(3) vs. 21 ± 15 μg/m(3), P < 0.001). Compared to outdoors, indoor PM contained more silicate (36% of particle number), organic (29%, probably originating from human skin), and Ca-carbonate particles (12%, probably originating from paper). Outdoor PM contained more Ca-sulfate particles (38%). Indoor PM at 6 μg/cm(2) (10 μg/ml) caused toxicity in keratinocytes and in cells expressing CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. Toxicity by CYP2B6 was abolished with the reactive oxygen species scavenger N-acetylcysteine. We concluded that outdoor PM(10) and indoor PM(10) from homes were devoid of toxicity. Indoor PM(10) was elevated, chemically different and toxicologically more active than outdoor PM(10). Whether the effects translate into a significant health risk needs to be determined. Until then, we suggest better ventilation as a sensible option. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Indoor air PM(10) on an equal weight base is toxicologically more active than outdoor PM(10). In addition, indoor PM(10) concentrations are about six times higher than outdoor air. Thus, ventilation of classrooms with outdoor air will improve air quality and is likely to provide a health benefit. It is also easier than cleaning PM(10) from indoor air, which has proven to be tedious.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913995     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00743.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  22 in total

1.  Size distribution of total and water-soluble fractions of particle-bound elements-assessment of possible risks via inhalation.

Authors:  D Voutsa; A Anthemidis; G Giakisikli; K Mitani; A Besis; A Tsolakidou; C Samara
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Trace element contents in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in urban school microenvironments near a contaminated beach with mine tailings, Chañaral, Chile.

Authors:  Stephanie Mesías Monsalve; Leonardo Martínez; Karla Yohannessen Vásquez; Sergio Alvarado Orellana; José Klarián Vergara; Miguel Martín Mateo; Rogelio Costilla Salazar; Mauricio Fuentes Alburquenque; Dante D Cáceres Lillo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Modeling indoor particulate exposures in inner-city school classrooms.

Authors:  Jonathan M Gaffin; Carter R Petty; Marissa Hauptman; Choong-Min Kang; Jack M Wolfson; Yara Abu Awad; Qian Di; Peggy S Lai; William J Sheehan; Sachin Baxi; Brent A Coull; Joel D Schwartz; Diane R Gold; Petros Koutrakis; Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 4.  Introducing an environmental assessment and intervention program in inner-city schools.

Authors:  Michelle Huffaker; Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Source of biomass cooking fuel determines pulmonary response to household air pollution.

Authors:  Thomas E Sussan; Vijendra Ingole; Jung-Hyun Kim; Sarah McCormick; Jesse Negherbon; Jonathan Fallica; Jason Akulian; Lonny Yarmus; David Feller-Kopman; Marsha Wills-Karp; Maureen R Horton; Patrick N Breysse; Anurag Agrawal; Sanjay Juvekar; Sundeep Salvi; Shyam Biswal
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.914

6.  Chemical characterization and source apportionment of indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) in retirement communities of the Los Angeles Basin.

Authors:  Sina Hasheminassab; Nancy Daher; Martin M Shafer; James J Schauer; Ralph J Delfino; Constantinos Sioutas
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Trace metals in size-fractionated particulate matter in a Portuguese hospital: exposure risks assessment and comparisons with other countries.

Authors:  Klara Slezakova; Simone Morais; Maria do Carmo Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Analysis of indoor particles and gases and their evolution with natural ventilation.

Authors:  Claire Fortenberry; Michael Walker; Audrey Dang; Arun Loka; Gauri Date; Karolina Cysneiros de Carvalho; Glenn Morrison; Brent Williams
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.554

9.  Effect of aerosol particles generated by ultrasonic humidifiers on the lung in mouse.

Authors:  Masakazu Umezawa; Keisuke Sekita; Ken-Ichiro Suzuki; Miyoko Kubo-Irie; Rikio Niki; Tomomi Ihara; Masao Sugamata; Ken Takeda
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 9.400

10.  Airborne particulate matter in school classrooms of northern Italy.

Authors:  Sabrina Rovelli; Andrea Cattaneo; Camilla P Nuzzi; Andrea Spinazzè; Silvia Piazza; Paolo Carrer; Domenico M Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.