H A Rogers1, N de Zoysa, S A Amiel. 1. Diabetes Research Group, King's College London, London, UK. helenrogers@nhs.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Risk of severe hypoglycaemia is increased by absence of subjective awareness of hypoglycaemia and reduced by avoidance of minor hypoglycaemia. For many, problems persist despite educational strategies that work for others. We explored psychological factors that might inhibit the efforts of an individual in hypoglycaemia avoidance. METHODS: People with Type 1 diabetes and hypoglycaemia unawareness gave semi-structured interviews exploring their perceptions and experiences of their condition. Identified factors were grouped into categories and analysed to establish links and form a grounded theory in a constant comparative analysis. A questionnaire was devised from the qualitative analysis to identify patients with problematic beliefs about their hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: Saturation (no new themes emerging) was reached with 17 patients. Responses fell into two groups: high concern and low concern regarding hypoglycaemia unawareness. Those in the first group described severe hypoglycaemia as aversive and wanted to regain awareness. The second group included three patients in whom unawareness was not associated with severe hypoglycaemia, nevertheless unhelpful attitudes which inhibited hypoglycaemia avoidance were expressed. Responses from this group fell into categories: (1) normalizing the presence of unawareness; (2) underestimating its consequences; (3) wanting to avoiding the 'sick role'; and (4) overestimating the consequences of hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: A qualitative analysis of patient interviews identified deficits in education, technology and motivation in hypoglycaemia unawareness. Interventions can therefore be tailored to target underlying problems that prevent individual patients from regaining awareness. A brief assessment tool was devised to categorize patients' hypoglycaemia unawareness accordingly. Psychological interventions should be developed to address the problems of 'low concern' regarding hypoglycaemia unawareness.
OBJECTIVE: Risk of severe hypoglycaemia is increased by absence of subjective awareness of hypoglycaemia and reduced by avoidance of minor hypoglycaemia. For many, problems persist despite educational strategies that work for others. We explored psychological factors that might inhibit the efforts of an individual in hypoglycaemia avoidance. METHODS:People with Type 1 diabetes and hypoglycaemia unawareness gave semi-structured interviews exploring their perceptions and experiences of their condition. Identified factors were grouped into categories and analysed to establish links and form a grounded theory in a constant comparative analysis. A questionnaire was devised from the qualitative analysis to identify patients with problematic beliefs about their hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: Saturation (no new themes emerging) was reached with 17 patients. Responses fell into two groups: high concern and low concern regarding hypoglycaemia unawareness. Those in the first group described severe hypoglycaemia as aversive and wanted to regain awareness. The second group included three patients in whom unawareness was not associated with severe hypoglycaemia, nevertheless unhelpful attitudes which inhibited hypoglycaemia avoidance were expressed. Responses from this group fell into categories: (1) normalizing the presence of unawareness; (2) underestimating its consequences; (3) wanting to avoiding the 'sick role'; and (4) overestimating the consequences of hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: A qualitative analysis of patient interviews identified deficits in education, technology and motivation in hypoglycaemia unawareness. Interventions can therefore be tailored to target underlying problems that prevent individual patients from regaining awareness. A brief assessment tool was devised to categorize patients' hypoglycaemia unawareness accordingly. Psychological interventions should be developed to address the problems of 'low concern' regarding hypoglycaemia unawareness.
Authors: Pratik Choudhary; Michael R Rickels; Peter A Senior; Marie-Christine Vantyghem; Paola Maffi; Thomas W Kay; Bart Keymeulen; Nobuya Inagaki; Frantisek Saudek; Roger Lehmann; Bernhard J Hering Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Marie M Henriksen; Henrik U Andersen; Birger Thorsteinsson; Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Peter Jacob; Munachiso Nwokolo; Sally M Cordon; Ian A Macdonald; Fernando O Zelaya; Stephanie A Amiel; Owen O'Daly; Pratik Choudhary Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 6.960
Authors: Parizad Avari; Rebecca Unsworth; Siân Rilstone; Chukwuma Uduku; Karen M Logan; Neil E Hill; Ian F Godsland; Monika Reddy; Nick Oliver Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 3.240