Literature DB >> 21913735

5% lidocaine medicated plaster in elderly patients with postherpetic neuralgia: results of a compassionate use programme in France.

Florentin Clère1, Claire Delorme-Morin, Brigitte George, Malou Navez, Bruno Rioult, Florence Tiberghien-Chatelain, Hervé Ganry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a common, debilitating complication of herpes zoster that has a major impact on patients' quality of life. PHN prevalence increases with advancing age. One treatment option is the topical analgesic 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster (Versatis®), which has been proven to be efficacious and well tolerated in a number of randomized clinical studies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to assess the use of the lidocaine medicated plaster under clinical practice conditions in a patient population whose previous PHN treatment with antidepressant and/or antiepileptic agents was inadequate or was not tolerated, or for whom such treatment was contraindicated or not recommended.
METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional observation conducted in private and public health centres in France under a compassionate use programme (CUP). To obtain this new - and, at the time, unauthorized - PHN treatment alternative, physicians (in accordance with French guidelines) had to complete standardized case report forms for each patient before his/her inclusion in the CUP. As it was a CUP and therefore a non-interventional observation, returning documented information on follow-up visits to the medication provider was voluntary, and only a limited number of physicians returned completed forms. Documentation was, however, mandatory for adverse events (AEs) occurrence. Depending on the size of the painful skin area, up to three lidocaine plasters daily were applied for a maximum of 12 hours with plaster-free intervals of at least 12 hours. The study assessed changes in the prescription of concomitant PHN medication from the start of lidocaine plaster treatment to the last follow-up visit, both in terms of the sum of all concomitant PHN treatments and stratified by type of treatment: antiepileptic drugs, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), classical analgesics (classified as step 1, 2 or 3 according to the WHO cancer pain ladder), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and others (mainly NSAIDs). AEs were monitored for safety.
RESULTS: A total of 625 patients were included in the CUP and permitted to receive lidocaine plaster treatment. Physicians returned 273 documented follow-up visit report forms. The mean ± SD CUP duration (i.e. duration of lidocaine plaster treatment) was 2.4 ± 2.5 months (median 1 month). Efficacy was assessed in the group of patients with documented follow-up visits (n = 273; mean ± SD age 73.6 ± 11.2 years), of whom 184 were aged ≥70 years (elderly efficacy population). The safety analysis included 625 patients (mean ± SD age 73.2 ± 11.9 years). Lidocaine plaster treatment resulted in a significant mean reduction of one concomitant PHN treatment per patient in the overall efficacy population analysed at the end of the observation (p < 0.001). In both populations (overall efficacy and elderly efficacy population), significantly fewer patients received TCAs (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively), step 3 analgesics (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively), and other miscellaneous treatments (p < 0.001 for both populations); there was also a significant reduction in the proportion of patients who took step 2 analgesics (p = 0.009) in the overall efficacy group. AEs (mainly related to local plaster application) were documented for 2.6% of the patients in the safety population; none were considered serious.
CONCLUSIONS: In day-to-day clinical practice management of PHN, treatment with the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster permitted a significant quantitative reduction in concomitant treatments for neuropathic pain in the overall efficacy population. In the subgroup aged ≥70 years, the quantitative reduction was non-significant. However, in both populations, 5% lidocaine medicated plaster reduced use of TCAs and step 3 analgesics. An improved polymedication status and good tolerability in this likely multimorbid age group indicate that the plaster is a new therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from PHN in France.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913735     DOI: 10.2165/11595600-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  28 in total

Review 1.  Safety and tolerability of the lidocaine patch 5%, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Arnold R Gammaitoni; Nancy A Alvarez; Bradley S Galer
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 2.  Neuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment.

Authors:  Ralf Baron; Andreas Binder; Gunnar Wasner
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enriched enrollment study.

Authors:  B S Galer; M C Rowbotham; J Perander; E Friedman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Alec B O'Connor; Joseph Audette; Ralf Baron; Geoffrey K Gourlay; Maija L Haanpää; Joel L Kent; Elliot J Krane; Alyssa A Lebel; Robert M Levy; Sean C Mackey; John Mayer; Christine Miaskowski; Srinivasa N Raja; Andrew S C Rice; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett Stacey; Steven Stanos; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Dennis C Turk; Gary A Walco; Christopher D Wells
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Characteristics of patients with herpes zoster on presentation to practitioners in France.

Authors:  C Chidiac; J Bruxelle; J P Daures; T Hoang-Xuan; P Morel; A Leplège; A El Hasnaoui; C de Labareyre
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  An evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Nanna B Finnerup; Marit Otto; Troels S Jensen; Søren H Sindrup
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-05-15

Review 7.  A review of the epidemiology of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, and less commonly studied neuropathic pain conditions.

Authors:  Alesia Sadosky; Anne M McDermott; Nancy A Brandenburg; Marcie Strauss
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Efficacy and tolerability of a 5% lidocaine medicated plaster for the topical treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a long-term study.

Authors:  Guy Hans; Rainer Sabatowski; Andreas Binder; Irmgard Boesl; Peter Rogers; Ralf Baron
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 9.  An update on the pharmacological management of post-herpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Che S Zin; Lisa M Nissen; Maree T Smith; James P O'Callaghan; Brendan J Moore
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: optimizing management in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Robert W Johnson; Gunnar Wasner; Patricia Saddier; Ralf Baron
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Topical Treatment of Localized Neuropathic Pain in the Elderly.

Authors:  Gisèle Pickering; Camille Lucchini
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Topical analgesics for neuropathic pain in the elderly: current and future prospects.

Authors:  Jana Sawynok
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  [Interdisciplinary guidance for pain management in nursing home residents].

Authors:  I Wulff; F Könner; M Kölzsch; A Budnick; D Dräger; R Kreutz
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Building a diagnostic algorithm on localized neuropathic pain (LNP) and targeted topical treatment: focus on 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster.

Authors:  Roberto Casale; Consalvo Mattia
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 5.  The topical 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in localized neuropathic pain: a reappraisal of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  Oscar A de León-Casasola; Victor Mayoral
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  A Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia from Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Cun-Xiang Gao; Ke-Tao Ma; Li Li; Zhi-Gang Dai; Sheng Wang; Jun-Qiang Si
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Can treatment success with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster be predicted in cancer pain with neuropathic components or trigeminal neuropathic pain?

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Kern; Srinivas Nalamachu; Louis Brasseur; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Influence of anatomic location of lidocaine patch 5% on effectiveness and tolerability for postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Srinivas Nalamachu; Matthew Wieman; Leah Bednarek; Surya Chitra
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Reduction of painful area as new possible therapeutic target in post-herpetic neuropathic pain treated with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster: a case series.

Authors:  Roberto Casale; Maria Di Matteo; Cristina E Minella; Guido Fanelli; Massimo Allegri
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.133

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.