Literature DB >> 21913585

Understanding identifiability in secondary health data.

Niko Yiannakoulias1.   

Abstract

Secondary health data are becoming important sources of information for health research. Unfortunately, there are few national guidelines outlining clear criteria for data custodians when adjudicating requests for access to these data. This presents a particular challenge to researchers and even public health officials interested in multi-jurisdictional analysis of health data. While some of the problem in developing consistent national standards may stem from differences in provincial privacy law, it may also be the result of imprecise terminology, particularly around the concept of identifiability. This commentary discusses the differences between identifiability and self-identification with the hope of contributing to a broader discussion establishing national guidelines for the use of secondary health data in research.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913585      PMCID: PMC6973589     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  9 in total

Review 1.  Privacy and confidentiality practices for research with health information in Canada.

Authors:  J Hagey
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  1997 Summer-Fall       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Privacy and the secondary use of data for health research: experience in Canada and suggested directions forward.

Authors:  Donald Willison
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2003-07

Review 3.  Balancing potential risks and benefits of using confidential data.

Authors:  Christina Davies; Rory Collins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-12

4.  Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper.

Authors:  Charles Safran; Meryl Bloomrosen; W Edward Hammond; Steven Labkoff; Suzanne Markel-Fox; Paul C Tang; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  State-of-the-art anonymization of medical records using an iterative machine learning framework.

Authors:  György Szarvas; Richárd Farkas; Róbert Busa-Fekete
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Data protection and the promotion of health research: if the laws are not the problem, then what is?

Authors:  Donald J Willison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-02

7.  Personal privacy and public health: potential impacts of privacy legislation on health research in Canada.

Authors:  M Anne Harris; Adrian R Levy; Kay E Teschke
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

8.  A method for managing re-identification risk from small geographic areas in Canada.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Ann Brown; Philip AbdelMalik; Angelica Neisa; Mark Walker; Jim Bottomley; Tyson Roffey
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.

Authors:  D J Willison; C Emerson; K V Szala-Meneok; E Gibson; L Schwartz; K M Weisbaum; F Fournier; K Brazil; M D Coughlin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.903

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.