Literature DB >> 21913276

Ultrasound evaluation of intra-abdominal sites of disease to predict likelihood of suboptimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study.

A C Testa1, M Ludovisi, F Mascilini, A Di Legge, M Malaggese, A Fagotti, F Fanfani, M G Salerno, A Ercoli, G Scambia, G Ferrandina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze in advanced ovarian cancer patients the ability of ultrasound to evaluate the extent of intra-abdominal disease and to predict the likelihood of suboptimal cytoreduction.
METHODS: Into this prospective study, 147 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled consecutively between January 2005 and October 2008. All patients underwent standard laparotomy and maximal surgical effort was attempted. To create a new scoring system to predict suboptimal cytoreduction we considered the following sonographic parameters: peritoneal carcinomatosis, bowel mesentery involvement, omental involvement, massive pelvic involvement, ascites and liver and/or spleen metastases. Those parameters achieving a negative predictive value ≥ 50% and a positive predictive value ≥ 50% in predicting suboptimal cytoreduction were included in the ultrasound scoring system, which was then calculated for each patient.
RESULTS: Ultrasound allowed a virtually conclusive diagnosis of massive pelvic involvement (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 97%), parenchymal liver metastases of any size (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 98%) and ascites (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 97%) and a very reliable diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 88%) and omental involvement (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 90%), whereas it was not very good at excluding parenchymal spleen metastases or splenic hilum involvement (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 98%) and bowel mesentery involvement (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 88%). Ultrasound-assessed peritoneal carcinomatosis, bowel mesentery involvement, omental involvement, massive pelvic involvement and ascites were included in our ultrasound score (which had a range of 0-6 points). With a cut-off value of > 5, the sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound score with regard to prediction of suboptimal cytoreduction were 31% (20/64) and 92% (46/50), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound examination is able to assess intra-abdominal disease in advanced ovarian cancer patients, with satisfactory concordance with laparotomic findings. Our ultrasound score can predict suboptimal cytoreduction and might be clinically useful.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21913276     DOI: 10.1002/uog.10100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  11 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; Michal Zikan; Pavel Dundr; David Cibula
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-28

Review 2.  Ultrasound in gynecological cancer: is it time for re-evaluation of its uses?

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; David Cibula
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intra-abdominal sites of implants to predict likelihood of suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Mercedes Espada; Jose R Garcia-Flores; Mar Jimenez; Elena Alvarez-Moreno; Mar De Haro; Lucia Gonzalez-Cortijo; Gines Hernandez-Cortes; Vicente Martinez-Vega; Ricardo Sainz De La Cuesta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Francesca Moro; Rosanna Esposito; Chiara Landolfo; Wouter Froyman; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin; Antonia Carla Testa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  Borderline tumours of the ovary: Common practice in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Koen De Decker; Henk G Ter Brugge; Joost Bart; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Hans W Nijman; Arnold-Jan Kruse
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-12-10

6.  Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.

Authors:  Maciej Stukan; Michał Badocha; Karol Ratajczak
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Lung and Intercostal Upper Abdomen Ultrasonography for Staging Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Method Description and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Maciej Stukan; Antonio Bugalho; Amanika Kumar; Julita Kowalewska; Dariusz Świetlik; Natalia Buda; Małgorzata Pietrzak-Stukan; Mirosław Dudziak
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05

8.  Correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis and clinical outcome after peritonectomy and HIPEC after 3 years of follow-up: preliminary results.

Authors:  B Klumpp; P Aschoff; N Schwenzer; I Koenigsrainer; S Beckert; C D Claussen; S Miller; A Koenigsrainer; C Pfannenberg
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Intra-abdominal fat. Part III. Neoplasms lesions of the adipose tissue.

Authors:  Andrzej Smereczyński; Katarzyna Kołaczyk; Elżbieta Bernatowicz
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2016-06-29

10.  The role of CA-125, GLS and FASN in predicting cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian cancers.

Authors:  G N A Winarno; Y M Hidayat; S Soetopo; S R Krisnadi; M D L Tobing; S Rauf
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.