Literature DB >> 21913265

Targeted quantitative bioanalysis in plasma using liquid chromatography/high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry: an evaluation of global selectivity as a function of mass resolving power and extraction window, with comparison of centroid and profile modes.

Yuan-Qing Xia1, Jim Lau, Timothy Olah, Mohammed Jemal.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest in exploring the use of liquid chromatography coupled with full-scan high resolution accurate mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) in bioanalytical laboratories as an alternative to the current practice of using LC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Therefore, we have investigated the theoretical and practical aspects of LC/HRMS as it relates to the quantitation of drugs in plasma, which is the most commonly used matrix in pharmacokinetics studies. In order to assess the overall selectivity of HRMS, we evaluated the potential interferences from endogenous plasma components by analyzing acetonitrile-precipitated blank human plasma extract using an LC/HRMS system under chromatographic conditions typically used for LC/MS/MS bioanalysis with the acquisition of total ion chromatograms (TICs) using 10 k and 20 k resolving power in both profile and centroid modes. From each TIC, we generated extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the exact masses of the [M + H](+) ions of 153 model drugs using different mass extraction windows (MEWs) and determined the number of plasma endogenous peaks detected in each EIC. Fewer endogenous peaks are detected using higher resolving power, narrower MEW, and centroid mode. A 20 k resolving power can be considered adequate for the selective determination of drugs in plasma. To achieve desired analyte EIC selectivity and simultaneously avoid missing data points in the analyte EIC peak, the MEW used should not be too wide or too narrow and should be a small fraction of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the profile mass peak. It is recommended that the optimum MEW be established during method development under the specified chromatographic and sample preparation conditions. In general, the optimum MEW, typically ≤ ±20 ppm for 20 k resolving power, is smaller for the profile mode when compared with the centroid mode.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913265     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.5178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of high-resolution and tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of nerve agent metabolites in urine.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Hamelin; William Bragg; Rebecca L Shaner; Leigh L Swaim; Rudolph C Johnson
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A tool to evaluate correspondence between extraction ion chromatographic peaks and peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics experiments.

Authors:  Cristian I Ruse; Samantha Peacock; Cornel Ghiban; Keith Rivera; Darryl J Pappin; Peter Leopold
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Direct injection high performance liquid chromatography coupled to data independent acquisition mass spectrometry for the screening of antibiotics in honey.

Authors:  Annie von Eyken; Daniel Furlong; Samareh Arooni; Fred Butterworth; Jean-François Roy; Jerry Zweigenbaum; Stéphane Bayen
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 6.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.