Literature DB >> 21912383

The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction.

P R Burton1, W A Brown.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has rapidly emerged as a popular bariatric procedure because of its safety, efficacy, durability and adjustability. Despite widespread use, there is limited understanding of how it induces weight loss. Previously, it has been classified as a restrictive procedure, physically limiting the patient to a small meal that subsequently slowly empties into the distal stomach. However, the tiny pouch of stomach created above the LAGB appears to be unable to accommodate even the smallest of meals. Therefore, the key mechanism has been hypothesized to be the induction of satiety via, as yet, undefined pathways. The critical question remains: what are the key physiological changes that lead to satiety and weight loss? In successful LAGB patients, a consistent intraluminal pressure at the level of the LAGB of 26.9 ± 19.8 mm Hg is observed. Studies using semi-solid swallows combined with intraluminal pressure recordings have demonstrated that semi-solid transit across the resistance of the LAGB is mediated by repeated esophageal peristaltic contractions (mean 4.5 ± 2.9) that produce episodic flow, interspersed by reflux events. Failed transit results in obstruction and regurgitation, whereas dilatation of the supraband stomach induces severe and intolerable reflux. Overall gastric emptying does not appear to be significantly altered following LAGB. Focused investigations have shown that the supraband stomach is empty of an ingested meal 1-2 min after intake ceases. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanical physiological effects of the LAGB on esophageal and proximal gastric function. These have been correlated with patient outcomes and sensations. On the basis of recent data, it appears that the LAGB activates the peripheral satiety mechanism without physically restricting the meal size. Therefore, it should not be classified as a restrictive procedure. The precise mechanism of weight loss with the LAGB remains to be delineated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912383     DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  30 in total

1.  Weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band and resolution of the metabolic syndrome and its components.

Authors:  G J Ooi; L Doyle; T Tie; J M Wentworth; C Laurie; A Earnest; M A Cowley; K Sikaris; C W le Roux; P R Burton; P E O'Brien; W A Brown
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Insights into proximal pouch dilatation following adjustable gastric banding--a form of inattentional blindness?

Authors:  John B Dixon; Ben J Dixon; Christopher S Cobourn
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Mechanisms underlying weight loss after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Alexander D Miras; Carel W le Roux
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Could the improvement of obesity-related co-morbidities depend on modified gut hormones secretion?

Authors:  Carmine Finelli; Maria Carmela Padula; Giuseppe Martelli; Giovanni Tarantino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Primary Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chetan D Parmar; O Efeotor; A Ali; Pratik Sufi; K K Mahawar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Gender influence on long-term weight loss after three bariatric procedures: gastric banding is less effective in males in a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Bekheit; Khaled Katri; Mohamed Hany Ashour; Bruno Sgromo; Galal Abou-ElNagah; Wael Nabil Abdel-Salam; Jean-Marc Catheline; El-Said El Kayal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Development of minimally invasive techniques for management of medically-complicated obesity.

Authors:  Farzin Rashti; Ekta Gupta; Suzan Ebrahimi; Timothy R Shope; Timothy R Koch; Christopher J Gostout
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Solid versus liquid-satiety study in well-adjusted lap-band patients.

Authors:  Laura V Jones; Kay M Jones; Chris Hensman; Ruth Bertuch; Toni L McGee; John B Dixon
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  To band or not to band--early results of banded sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  W Konrad Karcz; Iwona Karcz-Socha; Goran Marjanovic; Simon Kuesters; Matthias Goos; Ulrich T Hopt; Tomasz Szewczyk; Tobias Baumann; Jodok Matthias Grueneberger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  LAP-BAND for BMI 30-40: 5-year health outcomes from the multicenter pivotal study.

Authors:  J B Dixon; L L Eaton; V Vincent; R Michaelson
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.