Literature DB >> 2191236

Radiation therapy for arteriovenous malformations: a review.

C S Ogilvy1.   

Abstract

There have been numerous case reports and series of patients treated with partial brain irradiation, linear accelerator-based radiosurgery, gamma knife radiosurgery, and Bragg peak therapy for inoperable arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). These cases are summarized and compared. There is convincing evidence that radiation therapy does have a role in obliterating carefully chosen inoperable lesions. The changes that occur in vessel walls after radiation are reviewed. Data about x-ray and gamma radiation are mostly historical and difficult to evaluate because of the techniques of partial brain irradiation. There is a lack of data about the volume of AVM treated and the minimum dose delivered to the AVM nidus. For gamma knife, heavy particle, and linear accelerator therapy, more complete data are available. The incidence of hemorrhage during the first 2 years after treatment, when radiation-induced vascular changes are proposed to occur, is approximately 2.6% per year for gamma knife therapy, 2% per year for proton beam therapy, 2.3% per year for helium beam therapy, and 2.3% per year for linear accelerator therapy. These rates are similar to the recurrence rate for hemorrhage of 2.2 to 3% per year expected based on the natural history of untreated AVMs. If AVM obliteration after therapy is not achieved, the incidence of recurrent hemorrhage remains between 2% per year after treatment with gamma knife therapy. The incidence of hemorrhage for all patients treated was reported as 0.15% per year in one study and 20% over 8 years in a follow-up study using proton beam therapy. Mortality from hemorrhage after treatment was 0.6% after gamma knife therapy, 2.3% after helium beam therapy, and 2 to 5% after proton beam therapy. These figures for mortality are all lower than the 11% observed for the natural history of untreated AVMs. Permanent neurological deficits experienced as a complication of radiation occurred in 2 to 3% of patients treated with gamma knife therapy, 4% of patients treated with helium beam therapy, 1.7% of patients treated with proton beam therapy, and 3% of patients treated with stereotactic linear accelerator therapy. Proton beam therapy has been used for both small and large lesions. The majority of lesions in patients treated with gamma knife, helium beam, and linear accelerator therapy have been small (usually less than 3.0 cm average diameter) lesions. In these patients with small inoperable lesions treated with accurately directed fields of isocentric radiation, the greatest incidence of AVM obliteration has been observed on follow-up angiograms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2191236     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199005000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  14 in total

1.  Treatment of type D dural carotid-cavernous fistula by embolization followed by irradiation.

Authors:  L Pierot; M Poisson; M Jason; D Pontvert; J Chiras
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Stereotactic linac radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  B G Kenny; E R Hitchcock; G Kitchen; A E Dalton; D A Yates; S V Chavda
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Endovascular therapy followed by stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Y Arai; Y Handa; H Ishii; Y Ueda; H Uno; T Nakajima; S Hirose; T Kubota
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  De novo aneurysm formation after stereotactic radiosurgery of a residual arteriovenous malformation: case report.

Authors:  P P Huang; T Kamiryo; P K Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Intra- and paraventricular arteriovenous malformations: symptomatology, neuroradiological diagnosis, surgical approach and postoperative results.

Authors:  R Verheggen; M Finkenstaedt; K Rittmeyer; E Markakis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 6.  Conventional fractionated radiation therapy vs. radiosurgery for selected benign intracranial lesions (arteriovenous malformations, pituitary adenomas, and acoustic neuromas).

Authors:  L B Marks
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  The combined management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Experience with 100 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  R Deruty; I Pelissou-Guyotat; C Mottolese; Y Bascoulergue; D Amat
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Neurosurgical treatment or not?

Authors:  J W ter Berg; D W Dippel; J D Habbema; C J Westermann; C A Tulleken; J Willemse
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 9.  Neuropsychological effects of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Emily R Lantz; Philip M Meyers
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Significance of factors contributing to surgical complications and to late outcome after elective surgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  C Schaller; J Schramm; D Haun
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.