Literature DB >> 21912332

Comparing 3 methods of monitoring gentamicin concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Minyon L Avent1, Junlu Teoh, Judith Lees, Kerena A Eckert, Carl M Kirkpatrick.   

Abstract

Several nomograms and algorithms have been developed to individualize pharmacokinetic monitoring with their own advantages and disadvantages. This study compared 3 pharmacokinetic methods for predicting doses and monitoring of gentamicin in adult patients with febrile neutropenia. A retrospective study of 75 patients with febrile neutropenia was conducted at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia. Each patient received a course of once-daily gentamicin and had 2 sets of paired gentamicin serum concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters and ensuing doses were compared using 3 pharmacokinetic methods: (1) sequential Bayesian algorithm for gentamicin (SeBA-GEN), (2) Sawchuk-Zaske, and (3) Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic Dose Adjustment Nomogram. The initial median (range) dose of gentamicin administered was 400 (240-640) mg. SeBA-GEN and Sawchuk-Zaske methods recommended similar subsequent gentamicin dose adjustments of 400 (280-640) mg and 400 (280-640) mg, respectively, whereas the Therapeutic Guidelines recommended an increase to 1390 (210-6240) mg. For the Therapeutic Guidelines, 64% of the patients had measured serum gentamicin concentrations that were below the minimum line of the nomogram for the first set of concentrations with only 32% of these patients having an area under the curve value of <70 mg h/L as calculated by SeBA-GEN. The SeBA-GEN method showed a statistically significant increase (68%-77%) in patients attaining the target concentrations of maximum concentration (Cmax) 15-25 mg/L compared with the Sawchuk-Zaske method (72%-65%, P > 0.05). SeBA-GEN also demonstrated greater precision in predicting the area under the curve, Cmax, and minimum concentration (Cmin) compared with the Sawchuk-Zaske method. In conclusion, as the Bayesian approach, that is, SeBA-GEN demonstrated greater precision and more patients were attaining the target concentrations, it is therefore the preferred method for gentamicin monitoring in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912332     DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31822c78e9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  7 in total

1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Ross Norris; David L Paterson; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Optimising antimicrobial therapy through the use of Bayesian dosing programs.

Authors:  M L Avent; B A Rogers
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2019-08-07

3.  Evaluation of Tobramycin Exposure Predictions in Three Bayesian Forecasting Programmes Compared with Current Clinical Practice in Children and Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Marc Burgard; Indy Sandaradura; Sebastiaan J van Hal; Sonya Stacey; Stefanie Hennig
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Comparing dosage adjustment methods for once-daily tobramycin in paediatric and adolescent patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Stefanie Hennig; Franziska Holthouse; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  A Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Gentamicin in Pediatric Oncology Patients To Facilitate Personalized Dosing.

Authors:  C C Llanos-Paez; C E Staatz; R Lawson; S Hennig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Bayesian Estimation of Tobramycin Exposure in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Michael A Barras; David Serisier; Stefanie Hennig; Katrina Jess; Ross L G Norris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  How do we use therapeutic drug monitoring to improve outcomes from severe infections in critically ill patients?

Authors:  Gloria Wong; Fekade Bruck Sime; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.090

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.