Literature DB >> 21912290

Relationship between anaerobic cycling tests and mountain bike cross-country performance.

Allan Inoue1, Alberto S Sá Filho, Fernanda C M Mello, Tony M Santos.   

Abstract

Despite its apparent relevance, there is no evidence supporting the importance of anaerobic metabolism in Olympic crosscountry mountain biking (XCO). The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between XCO race time and performance indicators of anaerobic power. Ten XCO riders (age: 28 ± 5 years; weight: 68.7 ± 7.7 kg; height: 177.9 ± 7.4 cm; estimated body fat: 5.7 ± 2.8%; estimated ·VO₂max: 68.4 ± 5.7 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) participating in the Lagos Mountain Bike Championship (Brazil) completed 2 separate testing sessions before the race. In the first session, after anthropometric assessments were performed, the cyclists completed a single 30-second Wingate (WIN) test and an intermittent tests consisting of 5 × 30-second WIN tests (50% of the single WIN load) with 30 seconds of recovery between trials. In the second session, the riders performed a maximal incremental test. A significant correlation was found between race time and maximal power on the 5× WIN test (r = -0.79, IC(95%) -0.94 to -0.32, p = 0.006) and the mean average power on the 5× WIN test normalized by body mass (r = -0.63, IC(95%) -0.90 to -0.01, p = 0.048). The finding of the study supports the use of anaerobic tests for assessing mountain bikers participating in XCO competitions and suggests that anaerobic power is an important determinant of performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21912290     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234eb89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Sprint versus High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Training on Cross-Country Mountain Biking Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Allan Inoue; Franco M Impellizzeri; Flávio O Pires; Fernando A M S Pompeu; Andrea C Deslandes; Tony M Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Understanding the Physiological Requirements of the Mountain Bike Cross-Country Olympic Race Format.

Authors:  Arnaud Hays; Simon Devys; Denis Bertin; Laurie-Anne Marquet; Jeanick Brisswalter
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Effect of Two Different Training Interventions on Cycling Performance in Mountain Bike Cross-Country Olympic Athletes.

Authors:  Patrick Schneeweiss; Philipp Schellhorn; Daniel Haigis; Andreas Michael Niess; Peter Martus; Inga Krauss
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 4.  Current Perspectives of Cross-Country Mountain Biking: Physiological and Mechanical Aspects, Evolution of Bikes, Accidents and Injuries.

Authors:  Rhaí André Arriel; Hiago L R Souza; Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Moacir Marocolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  The Effect of Polarized Training (SIT, HIIT, and ET) on Muscle Thickness and Anaerobic Power in Trained Cyclists.

Authors:  Paulina Hebisz; Rafał Hebisz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Predictive ability of a comprehensive incremental test in mountain bike marathon.

Authors:  Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Patrick Schneeweiss; Peter Martus; Andreas M Niess; Inga Krauss
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-01-26

7.  Exercise Intensity and Pacing Pattern During a Cross-Country Olympic Mountain Bike Race.

Authors:  Steffan Næss; Ove Sollie; Øyvind Nøstdahl Gløersen; Thomas Losnegard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.