Literature DB >> 21912283

Optimal load maximizes the mean mechanical power output during upper extremity exercise in highly trained soccer players.

Daniel Jandacka1, Jaroslav Uchytil.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal load for the maximal power output during the acceleration phase of a power movement in bench press (BP) exercises of highly trained soccer players at the beginning of a competition period. Fifteen professional male soccer players with an average age of 26.1 ± 3.9 years, an average height of 183.3 ± 6.7 cm, an average body mass of 78.8 ± 7.2 kg, and an average 1 repetition maximum (1RM) of 83.3 ± 11.2 kg were employed as subjects in this study. Maximal mean power output during a BP at 0, 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90% of their 1RM was measured to determine whether an optimal load exists that allows for the attainment of maximal power output. Three-dimensional upper extremity kinematic data were collected. Two force plates embedded in the floor and positioned below the bench were used to measure contact forces between the bench and ground during the lift. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to determine power output differences at different percentages of the 1RM. The results of this study indicated that loads of 50% of the 1RM resulted in greater mean power output during the complete positive power movement. Loads at 30 and 50% of the 1RM resulted in greater mean power output computed from the acceleration phase of the lift than did all loads and were not statistically different from each other. However, individual soccer players did not reach the maximum power output with the same relative load. In conclusion, when soccer players develop muscular power toward the end of when the most important competitions are scheduled, dynamic effort strength training with the range of load from 30 to 50% of 1RM BP should be used. During the competition period, a load of 50% of a 1RM should be used in a BP to maintain muscular power over a wide load range.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912283     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31820dbc6d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship.

Authors:  Mark G L Sayers; Michel Schlaeppi; Marina Hitz; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-05-29

3.  Determination of strength exercise intensities based on the load-power-velocity relationship.

Authors:  Daniel Jandačka; Petr Beremlijski
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  The Effect of the Number of Sets on Power Output for Different Loads.

Authors:  Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Paulino Padial; Amador García-Ramos; Belén Feriche
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Force-Time Differences between Ballistic and Non-Ballistic Half-Squats.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Christopher B Taber; Christopher J Sole; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.