Literature DB >> 21911842

Craniofacial morphological differences between Down syndrome and maxillary deficiency children.

Flávia Aline Silva Jesuino1, José Valladares-Neto.   

Abstract

Maxillary deficiency is one of the facial features of Down syndrome (DS). Differences in craniofacial morphology between DS and nonsyndromic skeletal Class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency remain unclear. This study compared the craniofacial differences of white male children from Central-Western Brazil with DS (n = 30, mean age: 8 years 3 months), skeletal Class III profile with maxillary deficiency (n = 30, mean age: 7 years 9 months), and skeletal Class I profile (n = 30, mean age: 8 years 2 months), using lateral cephalometric radiographs. The differences among the three groups were compared with analysis of variance and Tukey's tests. The DS group showed reduced anterior cranial base (S-N, P < 0.001] and facial dimensions (Co-Gn, N-Me, N-ANS, and ANS-Me, P < 0.001), except in posterior dimensions (S-Go, P < 0.005; Ar-Go, P > 0.005). Maxillary length (Co-A, P < 0.001) and facial convexity (NAP, P < 0.005) were reduced when compared with the control group, although maxillary position to cranial base (SNA, P < 0.005) was within the normal range. A flattened cranial base (BaSN, P < 0.001) also contributed to differentiating DS from nonsyndromic groups. The group with maxillary deficiency showed a more unfavourable maxillomandibular relationship (MMD, P < 0.001) and a mandibular protrusion (SNB, P < 0.001). Subjects with DS differed from Class III with maxillary deficiency with respect to the flatter cranial base and reduced maxillary length. Maxillary deficiency was not so expressive in the face of DS subjects because of the overall reduction in craniofacial dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21911842     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Vestiges of Ossified Spheno-occipital Suture in an Elderly Patient With Down Syndrome and Lateral Skull Base Fracture.

Authors:  Reinhard E Friedrich; Felix K Kohlrusch; Ulrich Grzyska
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Cranial-Vertebral-Maxillary Morphological Integration in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Marta Teresa García-García; Pedro Diz-Dios; María Teresa Abeleira-Pazos; Jacobo Limeres-Posse; Eliane García-Mato; Iván Varela-Aneiros; Mercedes Outumuro-Rial; Márcio Diniz-Freitas
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  Chronic up-regulation of sonic hedgehog has little effect on postnatal craniofacial morphology of euploid and trisomic mice.

Authors:  Nandini Singh; Tara Dutka; Roger H Reeves; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Craniofacial features as assessed by lateral cephalometric measurements in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Nicholas Ching; Eric A Macklin; Lauren Voelz; Gil Weintraub; Emily Davidson; Lisa Albers Prock; Dennis Rosen; Richard Brunn; Brian G Skotko
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 5.  Skeletal malocclusion: a developmental disorder with a life-long morbidity.

Authors:  Nishitha Joshi; Ahmad M Hamdan; Walid D Fakhouri
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-09-09

6.  Craniofacial morphology in down syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ascensión Vicente; Luis-Alberto Bravo-González; Ana López-Romero; Clara Serna Muñoz; Julio Sánchez-Meca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.