BACKGROUND: Annuloplasty ring or band implantation during surgical mitral valve repair perturbs mitral annular dimensions, dynamics, and shape, which have been associated with changes in anterior mitral leaflet (AML) strain patterns and suboptimal long-term repair durability. We hypothesized that rigid rings with nonphysiological three-dimensional shapes, but not saddle-shaped rigid rings or flexible bands, increase AML strains. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sheep had 23 radiopaque markers inserted: 7 along the anterior mitral annulus and 16 equally spaced on the AML. True-sized Cosgrove-Edwards flexible, partial band (n=12), rigid, complete St Jude Medical rigid saddle-shaped (n=12), Carpentier-Edwards Physio (n=12), Edwards IMR ETlogix (n=11), and Edwards GeoForm (n=12) annuloplasty rings were implanted in a releasable fashion. Under acute open-chest conditions, 4-dimensional marker coordinates were obtained using biplane videofluoroscopy along with hemodynamic parameters with the ring inserted and after release. Marker coordinates were triangulated, and the largest maximum principal AML strains were determined during isovolumetric relaxation. No relevant changes in hemodynamics occurred. Compared with the respective control state, strains increased significantly with rigid saddle-shaped annuloplasty ring, Carpentier-Edwards Physio, Edwards IMR ETlogix, and Edwards GeoForm (0.14 ± 0.05 versus 0.16 ± 0.05, P=0.024, 0.15 ± 0.03 versus 0.18 ± 0.04, P=0.020, 0.11 ± 0.05 versus 0.14 ± 0.05, P=0.042, and 0.13 ± 0.05 versus 0.16 ± 0.05, P=0.009), but not with Cosgrove-Edwards band (0.15 ± 0.05 versus 0.15 ± 0.04, P=0.973). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of three-dimensional shape, rigid, complete annuloplasty rings, but not a flexible, partial band, increased AML strains in the normal beating ovine heart. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether annuloplasty rings affect AML strains in patients, and, if so, whether ring-induced perturbations in leaflet strain states are linked to repair failure.
BACKGROUND:Annuloplasty ring or band implantation during surgical mitral valve repair perturbs mitral annular dimensions, dynamics, and shape, which have been associated with changes in anterior mitral leaflet (AML) strain patterns and suboptimal long-term repair durability. We hypothesized that rigid rings with nonphysiological three-dimensional shapes, but not saddle-shaped rigid rings or flexible bands, increase AML strains. METHODS AND RESULTS:Sheep had 23 radiopaque markers inserted: 7 along the anterior mitral annulus and 16 equally spaced on the AML. True-sized Cosgrove-Edwards flexible, partial band (n=12), rigid, complete St Jude Medical rigid saddle-shaped (n=12), Carpentier-Edwards Physio (n=12), Edwards IMR ETlogix (n=11), and Edwards GeoForm (n=12) annuloplasty rings were implanted in a releasable fashion. Under acute open-chest conditions, 4-dimensional marker coordinates were obtained using biplane videofluoroscopy along with hemodynamic parameters with the ring inserted and after release. Marker coordinates were triangulated, and the largest maximum principal AML strains were determined during isovolumetric relaxation. No relevant changes in hemodynamics occurred. Compared with the respective control state, strains increased significantly with rigid saddle-shaped annuloplasty ring, Carpentier-Edwards Physio, Edwards IMR ETlogix, and Edwards GeoForm (0.14 ± 0.05 versus 0.16 ± 0.05, P=0.024, 0.15 ± 0.03 versus 0.18 ± 0.04, P=0.020, 0.11 ± 0.05 versus 0.14 ± 0.05, P=0.042, and 0.13 ± 0.05 versus 0.16 ± 0.05, P=0.009), but not with Cosgrove-Edwards band (0.15 ± 0.05 versus 0.15 ± 0.04, P=0.973). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of three-dimensional shape, rigid, complete annuloplasty rings, but not a flexible, partial band, increased AML strains in the normal beating ovine heart. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether annuloplasty rings affect AML strains in patients, and, if so, whether ring-induced perturbations in leaflet strain states are linked to repair failure.
Authors: Kevin D Accola; Meredith L Scott; Paul A Thompson; George J Palmer; Mark E Sand; George Ebra Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Wolfgang Bothe; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Elizabeth H Stephens; Julia C Swanson; David H Liang; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Ivan S Salgo; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Benjamin M Jackson; Frank W Bowen; Theodore Plappert; Martin G St John Sutton; L Henry Edmunds Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-08-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jorge Hernan Jimenez; Dennis Dam Soerensen; Zhaoming He; Shengqiu He; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Khurram Owais; Han Kim; Kamal R Khabbaz; Remco Bergman; Robina Matyal; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Philip E Hess; Feroze Mahmood Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Manuel K Rausch; Wolfgang Bothe; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Julia C Swanson; D Craig Miller; Ellen Kuhl Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Neil A Tenenholtz; Peter E Hammer; Assunta Fabozzo; Eric N Feins; Pedro J Del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: Funct Imaging Model Heart Date: 2013-06
Authors: Wolfgang Bothe; Manuel K Rausch; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Dominique K Echtner; Mario Walther; Neil B Ingels; Ellen Kuhl; D Craig Miller Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690