Literature DB >> 21911820

Early postoperative outcomes and blood product utilization in adult cardiac surgery: the post-aprotinin era.

Stacia M DeSantis1, J Matthew Toole, John M Kratz, Walter E Uber, Margaret J Wheat, Martha R Stroud, John S Ikonomidis, Francis G Spinale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin was a commonly used pharmacological agent for homeostasis in cardiac surgery but was discontinued, resulting in the extensive use of lysine analogues. This study tested the hypothesis that early postoperative adverse events and blood product utilization would affected in this post-aprotinin era. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Adult patients (n=781) undergoing coronary artery bypass, valve replacement, or both from November 1, 2005, to October 31, 2008, at a single institution were included. Multiple logistic regression modeling and propensity scoring were performed on 29 preoperative and intraoperative variables in patients receiving aprotinin (n=325) or lysine analogues (n=456). The propensity-adjusted relative risk (RR) for the intraoperative use of packed red blood cells (RR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.99), fresh frozen plasma (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.64), and cryoprecipitate (RR:0.06; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.22) were lower in the aprotinin versus lysine analog group (all P<0.05). The risk for mortality (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.79) and neurological events (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.35 to 2.18) remained similar between groups, whereas a trend for reduced risk for renal dysfunction was observed in the aprotinin group.
CONCLUSIONS: In the post-aprotinin era, with the exclusive use of lysine analogues, the relative risk of early postoperative outcomes such as mortality and renal dysfunction have not improved, but the risk for the intraoperative use of blood products has increased. Thus, improvements in early postoperative outcomes have not been realized with the discontinued use of aprotinin, but rather increased blood product use has occurred with the attendant costs and risks inherent with this strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21911820      PMCID: PMC3181091          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.002543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  26 in total

Review 1.  Effect of aprotinin on clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Artyom Sedrakyan; Tom Treasure; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dennis T Mangano; Iulia C Tudor; Cynthia Dietzel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of antifibrinolytic agents in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jeremiah R Brown; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Gerald T O'Connor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Preoperative statin treatment is associated with reduced postoperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an 8-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Leslie L Clark; John S Ikonomidis; Fred A Crawford; Arthur Crumbley; John M Kratz; Martha R Stroud; Robert F Woolson; James J Bruce; Joyce S Nicholas; Daniel T Lackland; Michael R Zile; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  An examination of methods for sample size recalculation during an experiment.

Authors:  R A Betensky; C Tierney
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores.

Authors:  D B Rubin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Conditional power calculations for early acceptance of H0 embedded in sequential tests.

Authors:  R A Betensky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Pharmacological strategies to decrease excessive blood loss in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of clinically relevant endpoints.

Authors:  M Levi; M E Cromheecke; E de Jonge; M H Prins; B J de Mol; E Briët; H R Büller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-12-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Re-evaluation of the role of antifibrinolytic therapy with lysine analogs during cardiac surgery in the post aprotinin era.

Authors:  Andreas Koster; Uwe Schirmer
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.706

10.  Aprotinin does not increase the risk of renal failure in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Anthony P Furnary; YingXing Wu; Loren F Hiratzka; Gary L Grunkemeier; U Scott Page
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

1.  Aprotinin revisited.

Authors:  Stacia M DeSantis; Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Analyzing Propensity Matched Zero-Inflated Count Outcomes in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Stacia M Desantis; Christos Lazaridis; Shuang Ji; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.404

3.  Interim monitoring of nonrandomized prospective studies that invoke propensity scoring for decision making.

Authors:  Stacia M DeSantis; Michael D Swartz; Thomas J Greene; Erin E Fox; John B Holcomb; Charles E Wade
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.697

Review 4.  Antifibrinolytics and cardiac surgery: The past, the present, and the future.

Authors:  Naresh K Aggarwal; Arun Subramanian
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun

5.  Low dose aprotinin increases mortality and morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Omid Aghadavoudi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Aprotinin may increase mortality in low and intermediate risk but not in high risk cardiac surgical patients compared to tranexamic acid and ε-aminocaproic acid -- a meta-analysis of randomised and observational trials of over 30.000 patients.

Authors:  Patrick Meybohm; Eva Herrmann; Julia Nierhoff; Kai Zacharowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluation of propensity score used in cardiovascular research: a cross-sectional survey and guidance document.

Authors:  Michelle Samuel; Brice Batomen; Julie Rouette; Joanne Kim; Robert W Platt; James M Brophy; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.