Joakim Alfredsson1, Johan Lindbäck, Lars Wallentin, Eva Swahn. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. joakim.alfredsson@liu.se
Abstract
AIMS: To assess gender differences in outcome with an early invasive or non-invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 46,455 patients [14 819 women (32%) and 31,636 men (68%)] from the SWEDEHEART register, with NSTE ACS, between 2000 and 2006, and followed them for 1 year. In the non-invasive strategy arm, the relative risk (RR) of death was (women vs. men) 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.11] and in the invasive strategy arm 1.12 (95% CI, 0.96-1.29). After adjustment for baseline differences between the genders, with propensity score and discharge medication, there was a similar trend towards better outcome among women in both the early non-invasive cohort [RR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99)] and the early invasive cohort [RR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.76-1.06)], although it did not reach statistical significance in the early invasive cohort. Results were similar with the combined endpoint death/myocardial infarction. An early invasive treatment was associated with a marked, and similar, mortality reduction in women [RR 0.46 (95% CI, 0.38-0.55)] and men [RR 0.45 (95% CI, 0.40-0.52)], without interaction with gender. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with NSTE ACS, reflecting real-life management, women and men had similar and better outcome associated with an invasive strategy.
AIMS: To assess gender differences in outcome with an early invasive or non-invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 46,455 patients [14 819 women (32%) and 31,636 men (68%)] from the SWEDEHEART register, with NSTE ACS, between 2000 and 2006, and followed them for 1 year. In the non-invasive strategy arm, the relative risk (RR) of death was (women vs. men) 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.11] and in the invasive strategy arm 1.12 (95% CI, 0.96-1.29). After adjustment for baseline differences between the genders, with propensity score and discharge medication, there was a similar trend towards better outcome among women in both the early non-invasive cohort [RR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99)] and the early invasive cohort [RR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.76-1.06)], although it did not reach statistical significance in the early invasive cohort. Results were similar with the combined endpoint death/myocardial infarction. An early invasive treatment was associated with a marked, and similar, mortality reduction in women [RR 0.46 (95% CI, 0.38-0.55)] and men [RR 0.45 (95% CI, 0.40-0.52)], without interaction with gender. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with NSTE ACS, reflecting real-life management, women and men had similar and better outcome associated with an invasive strategy.
Authors: Jing Li; Charanjit S Rihal; Yoshiki Matsuo; Muhamad Y Elrashidi; Andreas J Flammer; Moo-Sik Lee; Andrew Cassar; Ryan J Lennon; Joerg Herrmann; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; John F Bresnahan; Qi Hua; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Romana Herscovici; James Mirocha; Jed Salomon; Noel B Merz; Bojan Cercek; Michael Goldfarb Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2019-08-27
Authors: Ph Gabriel Steg; Nicola Greenlaw; Jean-Claude Tardif; Michal Tendera; Ian Ford; Stefan Kääb; Hélène Abergel; Kim M Fox; Roberto Ferrari Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-08-26 Impact factor: 29.983