Literature DB >> 21911222

Development of decision making: sequential versus integrative rules.

Brenda R J Jansen1, Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde, Hilde M Huizenga.   

Abstract

Decisions can be made by applying a variety of decision-making rules-sequential rules in which decisions are based on a sequential evaluation of choice dimensions and the integrative normative rule in which decisions are based on an integration of choice dimensions. In this study, we investigated the developmental trajectory of such decision-making rules. In the Gambling Machine Task, participants choose between options that differ in three dimensions: frequency of loss, amount of loss, and certain gain. The task was administered to 231 children and adolescents (age range=8-17 years). Latent group analysis of their performance allowed precise classification of the underlying decision rules. The majority of participants used sequential decision rules, and the number of evaluated dimensions in these rules increased with age. Integrative rule use decreased with age. We discuss these results in light of traditional developmental theories and fuzzy trace theory.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21911222     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  7 in total

1.  Decision-Making Deficits in Adolescent Boys with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): an Experimental Assessment of Associated Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tycho J Dekkers; Hilde M Huizenga; Arne Popma; Anika Bexkens; Jacqueline N Zadelaar; Brenda R J Jansen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2020-04

2.  Cool Decision-Making in Adolescents with Behavior Disorder and/or Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Anika Bexkens; Brenda R J Jansen; Maurits W Van der Molen; Hilde M Huizenga
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2016-02

3.  Impaired learning to dissociate advantageous and disadvantageous risky choices in adolescents.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Jessica V Schaaf; Ingmar Visser; Hilde M Huizenga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The influence of initial beliefs on judgments of probability.

Authors:  Erica C Yu; David A Lagnado
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-05

5.  Stop Saying That It Is Wrong! Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Markers of Children's Sensitivity to Punishment.

Authors:  Maria Luz Gonzalez-Gadea; Anouk Scheres; Carlos Andres Tobon; Juliane Damm; Sandra Baez; David Huepe; Julian Marino; Sandra Marder; Facundo Manes; Sofia Abrevaya; Agustin Ibanez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  What have we learned about the processes involved in the Iowa Gambling Task from developmental studies?

Authors:  Mathieu Cassotti; Ania Aïte; Anaïs Osmont; Olivier Houdé; Grégoire Borst
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-20

7.  Two-dimensional reward evaluation in mice.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; Marion Rivalan; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.