Literature DB >> 21910929

Targeted next-generation sequencing for routine clinical screening of mutations.

Jamie Mj Weaver1, Paul Aw Edwards.   

Abstract

In many fields it is now desirable to sequence large panels of genes for mutation, to aid management of patients. The need for extensive sample preparation means that current approaches for assessing mutation status in the clinical setting are limited. A recent publication demonstrates a single-step, targeted, true single-molecule sequencing approach to assessing the mutational status of BRCA1. Fragmented DNA samples are loaded directly onto a flow cell and sequenced, thus detecting both small- and large-scale mutations with minimal sample preparation and high accuracy.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21910929      PMCID: PMC3239233          DOI: 10.1186/gm274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Med        ISSN: 1756-994X            Impact factor:   11.117


In a recent article in Genome Research [1], Thompson and colleagues present a development of a next-generation sequencing technology - the HeliScope sequencer - that enabled them to detect mutations in the human breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) gene, as a model of a clinical diagnostic protocol. Their technique is accurate and requires limited sample preparation before sequencing. It therefore holds great promise for overcoming the emerging problem in clinical genetics of target overload: the presence of a large number of gene mutations of clinical relevance in a single disease entity. In no field is this challenge more apparent than in the genomics of cancer.

The clinical application of next-generation sequencing

The past few years have seen an unprecedented deluge of data on the genes mutated in cancer and other diseases. So far, the sequences of over 50 individual cancer genomes have been published and this number is set to increase exponentially. The advent of next-generation technologies (such as the Roche 454 GS FLX+, llumina Hiseq 2000, Applied Biosystems SOLID and HeliScope single-molecule sequencer machines), which allow a human genome to be sequenced in a single week-long run, has led to a large shift in our understanding of the mutations that drive cancers [2]. For the clinician, mutations in cancer can have relevance for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment choice. However, it is now apparent that these clinically relevant mutations will be both numerous and found at low prevalence in individual cancer types. In particular, for the majority of cancers there will be no single 'magic bullet' targeted therapy. The breakpoint cluster region-Abelson murine leukemia homolog (BCR-ABL) fusion kinase, which is characteristic of chronic myeloid leukemia, is the exception not the rule when it comes to druggable cancer genes; it seems, instead, that multiple drug targets will be mutated at low frequency throughout common cancers [3]. This target overload is not restricted to the management of cancers and is also seen with monogenic disorders, for example, mental retardation and hereditary cancer pre-disposition [4]. It is therefore necessary to screen numerous genetic loci to decide on the best course of clinical management for an individual patient and this must be done in a rapid and cost-effective manner. The current technology for searching for mutations is to amplify a region of interest - in multiple fragments of a few hundred base pairs each in separate PCR reactions - then sequence the products by standard Sanger chain terminator sequencing. Although highly accurate for the detection of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions or deletions, this approach is expensive, labor intensive and unable to detect large-scale insertions or deletions. Furthermore, in tumor samples, mutations may be missed. This is because Sanger sequencing can reliably detect mutant alleles only when they are present in more than about 20% of the relevant DNA, and this will not be the case, for example, for a heterozygous mutation in a tumor contaminated with 60% normal DNA, a scenario that is not uncommon [5].

Targeted true single-molecule sequencing

Thompson and colleagues [1] have used a next-generation true single-molecule sequencing (tSMS) system, the HeliScope sequencer, to profile the mutational pattern of the human cancer gene BRCA1. Germline mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with dramatically increased rates of breast and ovarian cancers and contribute to about 10% of all breast cancer cases [6]. In addition, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, a recently developed family of pharmaceutical agents, seem to show selective toxicity for cancers with mutations in the BRCA genes. Cost-effective sequencing of these genes is therefore a highly desirable clinical tool for the management of breast cancer patients and those with strong family histories of the disease. The technology used is a development of the HeliScope tSMS platform [1]. In the standard HeliScope protocol, DNA is fragmented and poly(A) adaptors are added to the ends of fragments. They are then captured on a glass slide coated with covalently bound poly(dT) oligonucleotides, and sequenced [7]. Thompson et al. [1] were able to dispense with the initial sample preparation steps (addition of poly(A) adaptors and 3' blocking - performed to prevent extension of the 3' end of bound poly(A)-tagged DNA molecules) and instead directly captured only the fragments of DNA belonging to the BRCA1 locus, using oligonucleotides that match sequences in the BRCA1 region (Figure 1). This targeted capture approach was highly successful. Approximately 20% of the sequenced reads mapped to BRCA1, which equates to about 100,000-fold enrichment of the target sequence. As the length of sequence that can be read in this system is limited, oligonucleotides were designed at 20-30 base pair intervals throughout the coding sequence of the gene, to ensure complete coverage. Importantly, the authors [1] were able to obtain sequencing results from as little as 100 ng of input material - thus showing that the technology could be used with samples collected as diagnostic biopsies.
Figure 1

Outline of the tSMS gene capture approach. Tumor material can be collected and (a) snap frozen to preserve intact DNA and RNA or (b) fixed in formalin then embedded in paraffin for section and histopathological review. Following (c) DNA extraction, (d) the DNA is broken by sonication to approximately 200 bp fragments. Green, sequences from the BRCA1 region; black, other regions. Formalin fixed material provides fragmented DNA, removing the need for a sonication step. (e) DNA fragments are hybridized to the flow cell, which is covered with oligonucleotides with sequence complementary to the region corresponding to the BRCA1 gene. BRCA1 sequences are therefore enriched on the flow cell. (f) Each individual molecule of DNA is then sequenced simultaneously by sequential addition of fluorescently labeled nucleotides (purple).

Outline of the tSMS gene capture approach. Tumor material can be collected and (a) snap frozen to preserve intact DNA and RNA or (b) fixed in formalin then embedded in paraffin for section and histopathological review. Following (c) DNA extraction, (d) the DNA is broken by sonication to approximately 200 bp fragments. Green, sequences from the BRCA1 region; black, other regions. Formalin fixed material provides fragmented DNA, removing the need for a sonication step. (e) DNA fragments are hybridized to the flow cell, which is covered with oligonucleotides with sequence complementary to the region corresponding to the BRCA1 gene. BRCA1 sequences are therefore enriched on the flow cell. (f) Each individual molecule of DNA is then sequenced simultaneously by sequential addition of fluorescently labeled nucleotides (purple). This approach [1] has several advantages over the more traditional Sanger sequencing commonly used for the detection of mutations. Firstly, there is little required in the way of sample preparation - only sonication of the DNA, and in the case of archival formalin-fixed material it is possible that even this step could be dispensed with - therefore reducing cost, turn-around time and the risk of errors in sample handling. Secondly, unlike Sanger sequencing, the HeliScope system allows the detection of large deletions, by determining the number of fragments of DNA that are present from a specific location; a decreased number of fragments from a region suggests a loss of genetic material. Finally, the HeliScope system directly sequences individual molecules rather than - as with Sanger sequencing - examining the average sequence of many millions of DNA molecules. This should provide increased sensitivity for the detection of low prevalence mutations, an essential feature in the sequencing of a heterogeneous cancer sample. The present technology [1] is an advance over recently presented techniques for analyzing the mutational status of target genes using next-generation sequencing instruments [8,9]. With the advent of more competitively priced next-generation sequencing machines, which can provide sequence data in a matter of hours, not days (such as Life Technologies' Ion-torrent and Illumina's Miseq), it is feasible that such approaches could be used routinely in the clinical setting. However, the instruments involved still require the selective amplification of target DNA and the relatively complex preparation of this material for sequencing. Thus, although they take advantage of the exceptionally cheap per-base cost of next-generation sequencing, competing techniques are still limited by its flaws: high complexity and slow turnaround time. Genotyping by mass spectrometry has also been applied to the resequencing of relevant mutations [10]. This approach, although sensitive, is limited, in that it is capable of detecting only known mutations and will therefore miss novel gene lesions.

The future of gene sequencing in the clinic

For the foreseeable future, the high cost and complexity of data analysis will limit the application of whole-genome sequencing for the detection of mutations in a clinical setting. Targeted resequencing of areas of interest will therefore remain key to determining mutational status. The method published by Thompson et al. [1] is a stride forward in putting this into practice. Although currently only a single gene is screened, there is clearly scope for the creation of multi-gene capture arrays, allowing large numbers of loci to be analyzed rapidly and cost-effectively with low DNA input requirements. In its simplicity, this approach provides an opportunity to truly begin integrating the vast quantity of genomic data generated in this next-generation era with clinical practice.

Abbreviations

BRCA: breast cancer gene; tSMS: true single-molecule sequencing.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  10 in total

1.  A de novo paradigm for mental retardation.

Authors:  Lisenka E L M Vissers; Joep de Ligt; Christian Gilissen; Irene Janssen; Marloes Steehouwer; Petra de Vries; Bart van Lier; Peer Arts; Nienke Wieskamp; Marisol del Rosario; Bregje W M van Bon; Alexander Hoischen; Bert B A de Vries; Han G Brunner; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Eunice L Kwak; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Benjamin Solomon; Robert G Maki; Sai-Hong I Ou; Bruce J Dezube; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Woo-Ho Kim; Thomas J Lynch; Panos Fidias; Hannah Stubbs; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist; WeiWei Tan; Leena Gandhi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Greg C Wei; S Martin Shreeve; Mark J Ratain; Jeffrey Settleman; James G Christensen; Daniel A Haber; Keith Wilner; Ravi Salgia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome.

Authors:  Timothy D Harris; Phillip R Buzby; Hazen Babcock; Eric Beer; Jayson Bowers; Ido Braslavsky; Marie Causey; Jennifer Colonell; James Dimeo; J William Efcavitch; Eldar Giladi; Jaime Gill; John Healy; Mirna Jarosz; Dan Lapen; Keith Moulton; Stephen R Quake; Kathleen Steinmann; Edward Thayer; Anastasia Tyurina; Rebecca Ward; Howard Weiss; Zheng Xie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comparison of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of KRAS mutations: diagnostic and clinical implications.

Authors:  Athanasios C Tsiatis; Alexis Norris-Kirby; Roy G Rich; Michael J Hafez; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Kathleen M Murphy
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Single-step capture and sequencing of natural DNA for detection of BRCA1 mutations.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Jeffrey G Reifenberger; Eldar Giladi; Kristen Kerouac; Jaime Gill; Erik Hansen; Avak Kahvejian; Philipp Kapranov; Travis Knope; Doron Lipson; Kathleen E Steinmann; Patrice M Milos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Tom Walsh; Ming K Lee; Silvia Casadei; Anne M Thornton; Sunday M Stray; Christopher Pennil; Alex S Nord; Jessica B Mandell; Elizabeth M Swisher; Mary-Claire King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic diagnosis of familial breast cancer using clonal sequencing.

Authors:  Joanne E Morgan; Ian M Carr; Eamonn Sheridan; Carol E Chu; Bruce Hayward; Nick Camm; Helen A Lindsay; Chris J Mattocks; Alexander F Markham; David T Bonthron; Graham R Taylor
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome.

Authors:  Erin D Pleasance; R Keira Cheetham; Philip J Stephens; David J McBride; Sean J Humphray; Chris D Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R Ordóñez; Graham R Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie Alipaz; Markus J Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula I Kokko-Gonzales; Niall A Gormley; Russell J Grocock; Christian D Haudenschild; Matthew M Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Laura J Mudie; Zemin Ning; Tom Royce; Ole B Schulz-Trieglaff; Anastassia Spiridou; Lucy A Stebbings; Lukasz Szajkowski; Jon Teague; David Williamson; Lynda Chin; Mark T Ross; Peter J Campbell; David R Bentley; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King; Joan H Marks; Jessica B Mandell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Profiling critical cancer gene mutations in clinical tumor samples.

Authors:  Laura E MacConaill; Catarina D Campbell; Sarah M Kehoe; Adam J Bass; Charles Hatton; Lili Niu; Matt Davis; Keluo Yao; Megan Hanna; Chandrani Mondal; Lauren Luongo; Caroline M Emery; Alissa C Baker; Juliet Philips; Deborah J Goff; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Mark A Rubin; Kornelia Polyak; Jennifer Chan; Yuexiang Wang; Jonathan A Fletcher; Sandro Santagata; Gianni Corso; Franco Roviello; Ramesh Shivdasani; Mark W Kieran; Keith L Ligon; Charles D Stiles; William C Hahn; Matthew L Meyerson; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  BRCA1-directed, enhanced and aberrant homologous recombination: mechanism and potential treatment strategies.

Authors:  Seth M Dever; E Railey White; Matthew C T Hartman; Kristoffer Valerie
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Identification of novel variants in ten patients with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome by high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Jose María Bastida; Sara Morais; Veronica Palma-Barqueros; Rocio Benito; Nuria Bermejo; Mutlu Karkucak; Maria Trapero-Marugan; Natalia Bohdan; Mónica Pereira; Ana Marin-Quilez; Jorge Oliveira; Yusuf Yucel; Rosario Santos; Jose Padilla; Kamila Janusz; Catarina Lau; Marta Martin-Izquierdo; Eduarda Couto; Juan Francisco Ruiz-Pividal; Vicente Vicente; Jesus Maria Hernández-Rivas; Jose Ramon González-Porras; Maria Luisa Lozano; Margarida Lima; Jose Rivera
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for Clinical Diagnosis of 561 Mendelian Diseases.

Authors:  Yanqiu Liu; Xiaoming Wei; Xiangdong Kong; Xueqin Guo; Yan Sun; Jianfen Man; Lique Du; Hui Zhu; Zelan Qu; Ping Tian; Bing Mao; Yun Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multiple-gene panel analysis in a case series of 255 women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gianluca Tedaldi; Michela Tebaldi; Valentina Zampiga; Rita Danesi; Valentina Arcangeli; Mila Ravegnani; Ilaria Cangini; Francesca Pirini; Elisabetta Petracci; Andrea Rocca; Fabio Falcini; Dino Amadori; Daniele Calistri
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

5.  The frequency of cancer predisposition gene mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients in Taiwan: From BRCA1/2 to multi-gene panels.

Authors:  Pi-Lin Sung; Kuo-Chang Wen; Yi-Jen Chen; Ta-Chung Chao; Yi-Fang Tsai; Ling-Ming Tseng; Jian-Tai Timothy Qiu; Kuan-Chong Chao; Hua-Hsi Wu; Chi-Mu Chuang; Peng-Hui Wang; Chi-Ying F Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Targeted next-generation sequencing as a comprehensive test for Mendelian diseases: a cohort diagnostic study.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Jianfen Man; Yang Wan; Gao Pan; Lique Du; Long Li; Yun Yang; Liru Qiu; Qing Gao; Handong Dan; Liangwei Mao; Zhengyu Cheng; Chen Fan; Jing Yu; Mufei Lin; Karsten Kristiansen; Yin Shen; Xiaoming Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Genetic Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancers: How Many and Which Genes to Test?

Authors:  Davide Angeli; Samanta Salvi; Gianluca Tedaldi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.