| Literature DB >> 21910917 |
Michael J Berger1, David G Chess, Timothy J Doherty.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maximal isometric quadriceps strength deficits have been widely reported in studies of knee osteoarthritis (OA), however little is known about the effect of osteoarthritis knee pain on submaximal quadriceps neuromuscular function. The purpose of this study was to measure vastus medialis motor unit (MU) properties in participants with knee OA, during submaximal isometric contractions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21910917 PMCID: PMC3182963 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Figure 1Output screen for decomposition of the needle EMG interference pattern during a 30 s contraction of the vastus medialis in a healthy control subject. Five individual motor unit potential trains were identified (labeled 1-5 on the far left). Panel descriptions from left-to-right: MUP Template: individual needle motor unit potential trains representing the median of 51 N-MUPs assigned to the template; MUP Stability: Shimmer plot of the 51 N-MUPs; S-MUP Template: S-MUP derived from spike-triggered averaging of the needle signal; IDI Histogram: Distribution of the IDIs for the N-MUPs comprising the motor unit potential train; Firing Graph: plot of the firing rate characteristics (inverse of the IDI) over the 30 s interval. EMG: electromyography; N-MUP: needle motor unit potential; S-MUP: surface motor unit potential; IDI: interdischarge interval.
Demographic and needle and surface motor unit potential parameters for OA and control participants
| Male/Female | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| Age | 61.8 ± 5.9 | 61.3 ± 3.8 |
| Height (m) | 1.69 ± 0.07 | 1.72 ± 0.09 |
| Weight (kg) | 77.9 ± 24.0 | 99.9 ± 20.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.0 ± 27.3 | 33.4 ± 4.6 |
| WOMAC Score | 0.75 ± 0.76 | 42.4 ± 14.8* |
| Knee Extensor MVC (N•m/kg) | 1.87 ± 0.49 | 1.47 ± 0.43 |
| Peak-to-peak voltage (μV) | 548 ± 295 | 505 ± 318 |
| Duration (ms) | 10.5 ± 5.1 | 12.0 ± 4.9* |
| AAR | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.5* |
| Turns | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 3.0 ± 1.1 |
| Phases | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.7 |
| Negative peak amplitude (μV) | 41.2 ± 29.2 | 41.7 ± 29.2 |
| Negative peak duration (ms) | 8.9 ± 2.6 | 9.0 ± 2.4 |
| Negative peak area (μV•ms) | 180.4 ± 122.4 | 173.2 ± 98.7 |
| Firing rate (Hz) | 9.1 ± 1.9 | 8.4 ± 1.8* |
Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. BMI: body mass index; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Questionnaire; N-MUP: needle motor unit potential; AAR: area-to-amplitude ratio, S-MUP: surface motor unit action potential.
*Significant difference between Control and OA groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Distribution of S-MUP amplitudes expressed as total number per bin at 20% MVC for control (open bars) and OA (solid bars) participants. It appears that the OA participants had a greater number of relatively large S-MUPs, signifying a tendency towards increased MU size. S-MUP: surface motor unit action potential; MU: motor unit.