BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized importance of information provision across the cancer trajectory, little research has investigated family information needs recently after childhood cancer. This mixed-methods, multiperspective, study explored the information needs of families of childhood cancer survivors in the first year post-treatment. PROCEDURE: In total, 112 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 19 survivors (mean age 16.2 years, off treatment for ≤36 months), 44 mothers, 34 fathers, and 15 siblings. Interviews were analyzed inductively, line-by-line, using the framework of Miles and Huberman. Emergent themes were cross-tabulated by sample characteristics using QSR NVivo8. RESULTS: Participant views were mixed regarding the need for a "finishing treatment review" with their oncologist (the primary information source for most families); however, many mothers (29/44) and fathers (17/34) and most siblings (14/15) reported receiving insufficient information post-treatment. Information regarding fertility and how to prepare for likely post-treatment challenges were the most cited unmet needs. Online support was ranked highest by survivors (mean score: 7/2/10) and siblings (7.4/10), whilst parents preferred an information booklet (often due to concerns about accessing accurate and relevant information from the Internet). While many participants reported feelings of isolation/loneliness, many were reluctant to attend face-to-face support groups/seminars. CONCLUSIONS: Family members of survivors may experience the most acute unmet needs for information about fertility and in preparation for post-treatment challenges. However, provision of the correct amount of information at the right time for each family member during a highly stressful period remains clinically challenging.
BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized importance of information provision across the cancer trajectory, little research has investigated family information needs recently after childhood cancer. This mixed-methods, multiperspective, study explored the information needs of families of childhood cancer survivors in the first year post-treatment. PROCEDURE: In total, 112 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 19 survivors (mean age 16.2 years, off treatment for ≤36 months), 44 mothers, 34 fathers, and 15 siblings. Interviews were analyzed inductively, line-by-line, using the framework of Miles and Huberman. Emergent themes were cross-tabulated by sample characteristics using QSR NVivo8. RESULTS:Participant views were mixed regarding the need for a "finishing treatment review" with their oncologist (the primary information source for most families); however, many mothers (29/44) and fathers (17/34) and most siblings (14/15) reported receiving insufficient information post-treatment. Information regarding fertility and how to prepare for likely post-treatment challenges were the most cited unmet needs. Online support was ranked highest by survivors (mean score: 7/2/10) and siblings (7.4/10), whilst parents preferred an information booklet (often due to concerns about accessing accurate and relevant information from the Internet). While many participants reported feelings of isolation/loneliness, many were reluctant to attend face-to-face support groups/seminars. CONCLUSIONS: Family members of survivors may experience the most acute unmet needs for information about fertility and in preparation for post-treatment challenges. However, provision of the correct amount of information at the right time for each family member during a highly stressful period remains clinically challenging.
Authors: Eden G Robertson; Claire E Wakefield; Joanne Shaw; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Brittany C McGill; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amulya A Nageswara Rao; Deepti M Warad; Amy L Weaver; Cathy D Schleck; Vilmarie Rodriguez Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Claire E Wakefield; Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Brittany C McGill; Sarah J Ellis; Emma L Doolan; Eden G Robertson; Sanaa Mathur; Richard J Cohn Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Anneli V Mellblom; Live Korsvold; Arnstein Finset; Jon Loge; Ellen Ruud; Hanne C Lie Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: A Vedi; V Pennington; M O'Meara; K Stark; A Senner; P Hunstead; K Adnum; W Londall; L Maurice; Claire Wakefield; R J Cohn Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rebekah H Nagler; Elaine Puleo; Kim Sprunck-Harrild; K Viswanath; Karen M Emmons Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 3.603