BACKGROUND: This study investigates whether deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) micro-positron emission tomography (μPET)/computed tomography (CT) can serve as a tool for monitoring of the commonly used dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced murine model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: DSS-colitis was induced in Sv129 mice. In a first experiment, four animals were serially scanned with CT and FDG-μPET on days 0, 3, 7, 11, and 14. The ratio of the mean voxel count of the PET images in the colon and the brain was compared with the histological inflammation score and the colonic myeloperoxidase levels. A second experiment was performed to investigate whether FDG-μPET was able to detect differences in inflammation between two DSS-treated groups, one receiving placebo (n = 4) and one receiving dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) (n = 4), a compound that protects against DSS-induced colitis. RESULTS: The progression of the colonic/brain FDG-signal ratio (over days 0-14) agreed with the predicted histological inflammation score, obtained from a parallel DSS-experiment. Moreover, the quantification of normalized colonic FDG-activity at the final timepoint (day 14) showed an excellent correlation with both the MPO levels (Spearman's rho = 1) and the histological inflammation score (Spearman's rho = 0.949) of the scanned mice. The protective action of DMOG in DSS colitis was clearly demonstrated with FDG-μPET/CT (normalized colonic FDG-activity DMOG versus placebo: P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-μPET-CT is a feasible and reliable noninvasive method to monitor murine DSS-induced colitis. The implementation of this technique in this widely used IBD model opens a new window for pathophysiological research and high-throughput screening of potential therapeutic compounds in preclinical IBD research.
BACKGROUND: This study investigates whether deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) micro-positron emission tomography (μPET)/computed tomography (CT) can serve as a tool for monitoring of the commonly used dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced murine model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS:DSS-colitis was induced in Sv129 mice. In a first experiment, four animals were serially scanned with CT and FDG-μPET on days 0, 3, 7, 11, and 14. The ratio of the mean voxel count of the PET images in the colon and the brain was compared with the histological inflammation score and the colonic myeloperoxidase levels. A second experiment was performed to investigate whether FDG-μPET was able to detect differences in inflammation between two DSS-treated groups, one receiving placebo (n = 4) and one receiving dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) (n = 4), a compound that protects against DSS-induced colitis. RESULTS: The progression of the colonic/brain FDG-signal ratio (over days 0-14) agreed with the predicted histological inflammation score, obtained from a parallel DSS-experiment. Moreover, the quantification of normalized colonic FDG-activity at the final timepoint (day 14) showed an excellent correlation with both the MPO levels (Spearman's rho = 1) and the histological inflammation score (Spearman's rho = 0.949) of the scanned mice. The protective action of DMOG in DSScolitis was clearly demonstrated with FDG-μPET/CT (normalized colonic FDG-activity DMOG versus placebo: P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-μPET-CT is a feasible and reliable noninvasive method to monitor murineDSS-induced colitis. The implementation of this technique in this widely used IBD model opens a new window for pathophysiological research and high-throughput screening of potential therapeutic compounds in preclinical IBD research.
Authors: Yan Li; Benedikt Schaarschmidt; Lale Umutlu; Michael Forsting; Aydin Demircioglu; Anna Katharina Koch; Ole Martin; Ken Herrmann; Hendrik Juette; Andrea Tannapfel; Jost Langhorst Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Amanda C Freise; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Felix B Salazar; Richard Tavaré; Wen-Ting K Tsai; Arion F Chatziioannou; Nora Rozengurt; Jonathan Braun; Anna M Wu Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Babak Saboury; Ali Salavati; Alex Brothers; Sandip Basu; Thomas C Kwee; Marnix G E H Lam; Roland Hustinx; Edouard Louis; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Markus Brückner; Philipp Lenz; Marcus M Mücke; Faekah Gohar; Peter Willeke; Dirk Domagk; Dominik Bettenworth Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Yan Li; Michael Khamou; Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Lale Umutlu; Michael Forsting; Aydin Demircioglu; Johannes Haubold; Anna Katharina Koch; Nils-Martin Bruckmann; Lino Morris Sawicki; Ken Herrmann; James Hunter Boone; Jost Langhorst Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 3.039