Literature DB >> 21909998

Low-frequency sampling for PRx calculation does not reduce prognostication and produces similar CPPopt in intracerebral haemorrhage patients.

Edgar Santos1, Jennifer Diedler, Marek Sykora, Berk Orakcioglu, Modar Kentar, Marek Czosnyka, Andreas Unterberg, Oliver W Sakowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cerebral pressure reactivity index (PRx) correlates with the outcome in intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) patients and has been used to define an autoregulation-oriented "optimal cerebral perfusion pressure" (CPPopt). PRx has been calculated as a moving correlation coefficient between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) averaged over 5-10 s, using a 2.5- to 5-min moving time window, in order to reflect changes in MAP and ICP within a time frame of 20 s to 2 min. We compared PRx with a different calculation method [low-frequency PRx (L-PRx)], where rapid fluctuations of MAP and ICP are cancelled (waves with frequencies greater than 0.01 Hz).
METHODS: A total of 548.5 h of artefact-free data (sampling frequency 1 Hz) from 18 patients suffering from non-traumatic ICH were included in the analysis. L-PRx was calculated using minute averages, between both MAP and ICP, in 20-min moving correlation windows. CPPopt was calculated based on PRx and on L-PRx.
RESULTS: The averaged PRx values for each patient correlated with L-PRx (P = 0.846, p < 0.001). CPPopt based on standard PRx was identified in eight patients. In contrast, a CPPopt value based on L-PRx could be found in 12 patients. CPPopt values by both methods correlated strongly with each other (P = 0.980, p < 0.001). L-PRx had a similar correlation with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS) (0.667, p = 0.002) as did PRx (0.563, p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: L-PRx correlated with the outcome as good as PRx did. CPPopt could be identified in more patients using L-PRx. Slower MAP and ICP changes (in the range of 1-20 min) can be used for autoregulation assessment and contain important prognostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909998     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1148-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic autoregulation of cerebral blood flow measured non-invasively with fast diffuse correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ashwin B Parthasarathy; Kimberly P Gannon; Wesley B Baker; Christopher G Favilla; Ramani Balu; Scott E Kasner; Arjun G Yodh; John A Detre; Michael T Mullen
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  Review of studies on dynamic cerebral autoregulation in the acute phase of stroke and the relationship with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ricardo C Nogueira; Marcel Aries; Jatinder S Minhas; Nils H Petersen; Li Xiong; Jana M Kainerstorfer; Pedro Castro
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.960

3.  An optimal frequency range for assessing the pressure reactivity index in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Tim Howells; Ulf Johnson; Tomas McKelvey; Per Enblad
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Low-resolution pressure reactivity index and its derived optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in adult traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI study.

Authors:  Lennart Riemann; Erta Beqiri; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Nino Stocchetti; Oliver Sakowitz; Klaus Zweckberger; Andreas Unterberg; Alexander Younsi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Clinical Significance of Multiparameter Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Prognosis Prediction of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Yongbo Yang; Yuchun Pan; Chunlei Chen; Penglai Zhao; Chunhua Hang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Gradient adjustment method for better discriminating correlating and non-correlating regions of physiological signals: application to the partitioning of impaired and intact zones of cerebral autoregulation.

Authors:  Paul S Addison; André Antunes; Dean Montgomery; Ulf R Borg
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.502

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.