Literature DB >> 21909490

Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.

German O Gallucci1, Panos Papaspyridakos, Linah M Ashy, Go Eun Kim, Nicholas J Brady, Hans-Peter Weber.   

Abstract

The aim of this research was to compare the accuracy outcomes of open- and closed-tray implant impressions for partially edentulous patients. Eleven partially edentulous spaces in seven patients with two existing implants for fixed partial dentures were included. Group I (closed-tray) and group II (open-tray) were compared using microcomputed tomography scanning. No statistically significant differences were found between the closed- and open-tray techniques (P = .317). The subjective evaluation of patient comfort showed no differences with either impression technique. There were no differences seen between open- and closed-tray impression techniques in partially edentulous patients when implants had less than 10 degrees of angulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  3 in total

1.  Impact of design and length on the accuracy of closed tray transfer copings.

Authors:  Elena Roig; Natalia Álvarez-Maldonado; Luis-Carlos Garza; Marta Vallés; José Espona; Miguel Roig
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-08-01

2.  Evaluation of accuracy of various impression techniques and impression materials in recording multiple implants placed unilaterally in a partially edentulous mandible- An in vitro study.

Authors:  G Parameshwari; B Chittaranjan; N Sudhir; C-K Anulekha-Avinash; M Taruna; M Ramureddy
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-04-01

3.  A prospective clinical study on implant impression accuracy.

Authors:  Motaz Osman; Hassan Ziada; Ahmed Suliman; Neamat Hassan Abubakr
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-11-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.