Clinical evidence of efficacy of red yeast rice and berberine in a large controlled study versus diet.

Efficacy of a new patented proprietary combination of natural nutraceuticals (PN) containing natural hypolipidemic as red yeast, policosanol and berberine was tested in a large study on dyslipidemic patients in clinical practice. A parallel, controlled, randomized, multicenter study was designed. After 2 weeks on a stable dietary regimen, the patients were randomized to PN 1 tablet/day associated with diet (PN + D) or diet alone (D) for 16 weeks. Entry criteria were: Tot-Chol >200 mg/dL or LDL-Chol >150 mg/dL without a clear indication for statins, or plasma triglycerides >150 mg/dL. Lipid pattern and CV parameters were evaluated at baseline and monthly. 1,751 patients were enrolled in 248 Italian units, 933 patients on PN + D and 818 on D. The baseline lipid values were: Tot-Chol 255.4 versus 243.1 mg/dL, LDL-Chol 170.1 versus 162.2 mg/dL, HDL-Chol 50.0 versus 48.8 mg/dL, and TG 190.5 versus 184.4 mg/dL. PN constantly and significantly improved lipid parameters versus D group: at 16 weeks -19.1 versus -9.4% for Tot-Chol (p < 0.001), -23.5 versus -10.8% for LDL-Chol (p < 0.001), +11.6 versus +4.0% for HDL-Chol (p < 0.001), -17.9 versus -11.3% for TG (p < 0.001). In conclusions, PN plus diet allows an effective improvement of blood lipids with a significant reduction of global CV risk, suggesting a role for PN in CHD prevention.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes

Introduction

Lifestyle and diet changes are very important actions to be taken to improve the cardiovascular risk and should precede any pharmacological intervention on hypercholesterolemia, which is a well-known risk factor for coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral artery diseases [1-3].

Dietary counseling will take advantage from the recommendations to integrate diet with the introduction of a food supplement resulting in an improved compliance with a dietary regimen. Indeed, previous studies suggested that the combination of food supplements with diet leads to an improvement of lipid metabolism control [4, 5].

Furthermore, food supplements, reinforcing the subject’s motivation to comply with the lifestyle changes, can lead to postpone the prescription of hypo-lipidemic therapy and the resulting risk of adverse reactions, and even to be used as effective treatment in statin intolerant patients [6].

Many nutraceuticals are currently commercially available claiming an anti-dyslipidemic effect. The criteria for a correct selection include the guarantees that good manufacturing practice is as accurate as the one adopted for drug manufacturing, that the quality assurance allows to obtain a finished product with a standardized constant composition, and that clinical studies document the claims supporting the clinical evidence of efficacy and safety.

A recent opportunity offered by from the pharmaceutical research and development is represented by a patented proprietary combination of chemically well defined natural nutraceuticals (PN) [7]. This combination was designed to cover more CV risk factors with active principles for the control of plasma cholesterol (red yeast rice extract, policosanol, berberine), of triglycerides (berberine), of homocysteine (folic acid) and containing antioxidants (coenzyme Q10 and asthaxantin) [4, 5, 7, 8].

The major components of PN are red yeast rice extract, which contains monacolins that compete structurally at HMGCoA reductase level with HMGCoA, precursor of mevalonate, thus reducing plasma cholesterol [10, 11], and Berberine, a natural plant extract from Berberis aristata bark, reducing cholesterolemia by increasing LDL-Chol receptor on the liver cell surface, and inhibiting triglycerides biosynthesis via the activation of AMP activated proteokinase [12, 13].

In clinical studies, red yeast rice significantly reduced total and LDL cholesterol [14] and also Berberine improved triglycerides [15].

Clinical activity on Total and LDL cholesterol of PN combined with diet are documented in a controlled clinical study versus Berberine alone in moderate hypercholesterolemia [4].

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect on lipid profile and safety of PN added to diet and lifestyle management versus diet alone in hyperlipidemic patients in an extended multicenter-randomized study in clinical practice.

Materials and methods

A parallel, longitudinal, controlled, randomized, within centers, multicenter study was carried out to compare PN added to diet (PN + D) versus the control group receiving diet alone (D) by Italian general practitioners (GPs). Each GP was supposed to enroll 10 dyslipidemic patients (18–80 year) with or without metabolic syndrome, not requiring a drug therapy in accordance with ATPIII guidelines, or who had demonstrated side effects or had contraindications to lipid-lowering drug treatment. Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol levels >200 mg/dl and/or LDL cholesterol levels >150 mg/dl and/or triglycerides levels >150 mg/dl. The principles of Helsinki Declaration were applied, and specifically an informed consent was supplied and the subject’s right to withdraw from the study without giving reason was clearly allowed.

Pregnant or breast-feeding women and patients treated with anti-hypertensive and/or lipid lowering drugs were excluded.

The composition of the patented proprietary combination of nutraceuticals investigated is as follows: red yeast rice extract 200 mg (equivalent to 3 mg monacolins), policosanol 10 mg, berberine 500 mg, 0.2 mg folic acid, coenzyme Q10 2 mg, and asthaxantin 0.5 mg (Armolipid Plus, Rottapharm|Madaus).

All the patients were recommended to follow a low-glucose, low-calorie, low-fat dietary regimen in accordance with their clinical conditions, whilst the PN group added one tablet/day of PN. The treatment lasted 16 weeks.

Serum lipid pattern and vital signs were measured at baseline and every 4 weeks. (Tot-Chol, HDL-Chol, LDL-Chol, TG). Anthropometric and cardiovascular parameters were evaluated at baseline and every 4 weeks. At the end of the study, the patients expressed an overall judgment on the treatment acceptance by the following score: 0 = null, 1 = moderate, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good. Fasting plasma glucose and lipid levels were measured by standard methods. Waist circumference was measured at each visit at midway between the lowest rib and the iliac crest using an anthropometric tape. Systolic and diastolic BP values were measured with the aid of a standard sphygmomanometer after 5 min in sitting position, according to the guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (VB-Guidelines ESC/ESH 2007). Three BP values were obtained in the sitting position at 2 min intervals. The averages of these measurements were used for the analysis.

Adverse events, intercurrent diseases and compliance were also checked at 4 weeks intervals during the active treatment phase.

Statistical analysis

Sample potency for comparison between two independent samples was run assuming a similar sample size (N1/N2 = 1) and a small effect size (0.20) for an α-error probability of 0.05 and a potency of 0.90, requiring a total population sample of 1,052 observations [9]. Data were analyzed using Excel statistical software and expressed as average ± SEM. The statistical analysis on baseline homogeneity and clinical efficacy was carried out by means of χ2-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), applied when appropriate on the patients collected from the centers which complied with the controlled design. A comparison between the two arms was done using absolute differences and analyzed by ANOVA test. The null hypothesis was rejected for 2-tail α < 0.05.

A computerized internet procedure was used: each center was endowed with individual login and password to allow a protected access to the website http://www.armolipid.net for data input and results analysis.

Results

The study was carried out in 248 centers on 1,751 dyslipidemic patients randomized to PN + D (933 cases) and D groups (818 cases).

At start no clinically significant differences were present between the two groups concerning age, gender, BMI and waist circumference (Table 1).

Table 1

Vital characteristics at study baseline (average ± SEM)

Group	Age (years)	Gender (% F/M)	BMI (kg/m2)	Weight (kg)	Waist circ. (cm)
D (n = 933)	55.6 ± 0.4	55.5/44.5	28.4 ± 0.2	78.4 ± 0.5	99.0 ± 0.5
PN + D (n = 818)	57.3 ± 0.4	53.1/46.9	27.9 ± 0.2	77.0 ± 0.5	98.4 ± 0.5
p	p < 0.01	NS	p < 0.05	p < 0.05	NS

p  statistical significance between groups

The baseline clinical parameters, such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure values, heart rate, Tot-Chol, LDL-Chol, HDL-Chol, TG, fasting plasma glucose and body weight, were clinically compared between the two study groups (Table 2).

Table 2

Clinical characteristics at study baseline in D (n = 933) and PN + D (n = 818) groups (average ± SEM)

Group	SBP (mmHg)	DBP (mmHg)	HR (b/min)	Tot Chol (mg/dL)	LDL-Chol (mg/dL)	HDL-Chol (mg/dL)	TG (mg/dL)	Glycaemia(mg/dL)
D	134.3 ± 0.5	81.3 ± 0.3	74.4 ± 0.3	243.1 ± 1.0	162.2 ± 1.0	48.8± 0.4	184.4 ± 1.9	99.2 ± 20.4
PN + D	134.3 ± 0.5	81.5 ± 0.3	73.6 ± 0.3	255.4 ± 1.1	170.1 ± 1.1	50.0 ± 0.5	190.5 ± 2.1	99.6 ± 20.8
p	NS	NS	p < 0.05	p < 0.01	p < 0.01	p = 0.06	p < 0.05	NS

SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, p statistical significance between groups

After 4 weeks of treatment, the average reduction of Tot-Chol versus the baseline was −9.3% in the PN + D group and −5.4% in the D group and gradually reached, respectively, −19.1 and −9.4% after 16 weeks, with p < 0.001 between treatments for all times (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Total cholesterol reduction (%) versus baseline during diet alone or plus PN (Average ± SEM, ***p < 0.001 between treatments)

Likewise, the reduction of LDL-Chol was −11.9% in PN + D group and −5.9% in D group at the 4th week check and progressively attained correspondingly −23.5% in PN + D and −10.8% in D groups at the 16th week (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

LDL-Cholesterol reduction (%) versus baseline during diet alone or plus PN. (Average ± SEM, ***p < 0.001 between treatments)

HDL-Chol levels showed a moderate increase from +5.1% for PN + D and +1.2% for D after 4 weeks of treatment up to +11.6% for PN + D and +4.0% for D after 16 weeks (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

HDL-Cholesterol reduction (%) versus baseline during diet alone or plus PN. (Average ± SEM, ***p < 0.001 between treatments)

The reduction of plasma triglycerides was −12.7% in PN + D group and −8.1% in D at the 4th week down to −17.9% on PN + D and −11.3% on D at the 16th week (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Triglycerides reduction (%) versus baseline during diet alone or plus PN. (Average ± SEM, ***p < 0.001 between treatments)

The difference between treatments was statistically significant at all time points for all the lipid parameters with p < 0.001.

Body weight decreased similarly in the groups, respectively, for PN + D and D groups: −2.0 and −1.9% at 4 weeks, −3.3 and −3.0% at 8 weeks, −4.5 and −4.0% at 12 weeks, −4.8 and −3.9% at 16 weeks.

A positive relationship between hypocholesterolemic effect of PN + D and the baseline value of LDL-Cholesterolemia was detected at the 12th week (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Relationship between hypocholesterolemic effect of PN + Diet and the baseline value of total cholesterolemia at the 8th week

The normalization rate of total cholesterolemia (≤190 mg/dL) achieved during PN + D was higher than with diet alone and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01) starting from the 8th week (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

Rate of normalization of total cholesterolemia (≤190 mg/dL) during diet alone or plus PN (**p < 0.01 between treatments)

Mainly mild and moderate unwanted events judged by the physician with a probable, possible or certain correlation with the treatment were reported in 27/933 cases (2.9%) during PN + D treatment and 4/818 cases (0.5%) during D. Treatment withdrawal was reported in 8 cases (0.86%) on PN + D for the following reasons: asthenia, CPK increase, diarrhea, myalgia, dyspepsia (2), gastralgia (2). All these events, save gastralgia, had previously appeared in the same patients also with statins (Table 3).

Table 3

Main unwanted events judged as probably, possibly or certainly related to the treatment

Treatment No. of cases treated	D 818	PN + D 933
Constipation	–	6
Dyspepsia	–	5
Myalgia	–	3
Nausea	–	3
Diarrhea	–	2
Meteorism	–	2
Bitter taste	–	1
Asthenia	–	1
Headache	1	–
Vomiting	–	–
Dizziness	1	–
Itching	1	–
Steatorrhea	1	–

The treatment efficacy was assessed by the physician as good + very good in 71.7% of cases with PN + D and in 24.8% of cases with D (p < 0.001) and was confirmed by the treatment acceptance evaluated by the patient as good + very good in 80.1% of cases with PN + D and in 29.1% of cases with D (p < 0.001).

Discussion

The present randomized controlled study provides evidence that the addition to diet and lifestyle changes of a patented combination of natural nutraceuticals (PN), based on red yeast rice extract and berberine, can improve significantly the lipid profile versus diet alone in dyslipidemic subjects in whom a hypolipidemic therapy is not yet indicated or not well tolerated or is contraindicated.

The study produced reliable and robust data, because obtained in a very large representative sample of the general population, according to a correct methodological design, for an adequate duration of treatment, under conditions adherent to the usual daily clinical practice. These considerations and the planned lack of diet standardization allow the outcome of this study to be extrapolated to the general population. Moreover, the results are in agreement with the ones reported in a preliminary controlled double-blind clinical study versus an active control group in moderate hyperlipidemia [4].

The effect on lipids was independent of the diet as both groups showed a similar and parallel reduction of body weight during treatment, proving that the dietary restrictions were adopted by the whole sample.

Indeed, the opportunity of prescribing active nutraceuticals can favor the compliance with the dietary changes recommended by the physician and usually not accurately followed by the patients.

Currently, the assortment of nutraceuticals is very wide and in their selection a careful attention should be paid to products that assure a standardized and constant composition and quality and whose claimed clinical efficacy and safety are documented.

The clinical outcome showed the efficacy of the nutraceuticals contained in PN [4, 6, 13, 14] even exhibiting a lipid profile improvement independently of age classes, gender and administration time during the day [16] and the remarkable increase in HDL-Chol observed in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Moreover, PN reduced the incidence of MetS and improved the Framingham Risk Score achieving a significant change of global CV risk class versus D [17]. The positive correlation between the level of LDL-Chol at the beginning of PN treatment and the decrease of LDL-Chol achieved after 12 weeks does not limit the use of PN to subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia.

An important feature of PN is its good safety as shown by the very low incidence of adverse reactions such as constipation (0.6%), dyspepsia (0.5%), nausea (0.3%), and diarrhoea (0.2%). The onset of myalgia, the adverse event more worried the patients because it impairs their quality of life, occurs in a low number of cases (0.3%), as compared to statins, and required a precautionary withdrawal of treatment in one patient (0.1%). In a long term study where the patients were the controls of themselves, patients were previously intolerant to more than one statin significantly improved their blood lipid picture without complaining side effects [6]. This favorable safety profile allows to administer PN even in patients that, according to international guidelines for higher added cardiovascular disease risk, should be treated with statins. The occurrence of myalgia is linked to monacolin K, whose molecular structure correspond to a that of a mild statin. The rare incidence of this side-effect in the PN + D group is due to the low daily dose of monacolin K in PN, classified as food supplement, as compared to the correspondent statin prescription drug (3 mg versus the smallest 10 mg therapeutic dose of lovastatin). Notwithstanding the small dose of monacolin, PN was effective as the action of monacolin K is integrated by the whole monacolins family contained in red yeast rice extract and by the synergistic action of berberine and policosanol. In facts, berberine increases LDLR expression by a mechanism distinct from statins and monacolin K, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzime A reductase. Experimental data provide evidence that berberine and lovastatin had additive stimulating effects on LDLR mRNA expression and that berberine activity was not reduced at all by lovastatin [15]. These results show the synergy of action of the combination among berberine, red yeast rice and policosanol, previously found in an animal study.

As final conclusion, the variety of the available data supports the rationale for recommending the PN combination of nutraceuticals with lifestyle changes and a balanced diet as an effective approach to dyslipidemic patients [4, 5, 17].