| Literature DB >> 21909412 |
Nico Eisenhauer1, Varvara D Migunova, Michael Ackermann, Liliane Ruess, Stefan Scheu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Changes in plant diversity may induce distinct changes in soil food web structure and accompanying soil feedbacks to plants. However, knowledge of the long-term consequences of plant community simplification for soil animal food webs and functioning is scarce. Nematodes, the most abundant and diverse soil Metazoa, represent the complexity of soil food webs as they comprise all major trophic groups and allow calculation of a number of functional indices. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21909412 PMCID: PMC3164708 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Photograph of the field site of the Jena Experiment and an exemplary nematode.
The upper photograph was taken in 2006 showing the main experimental plots (20×20 m) varying in plant species richness (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 60 species) and plant functional group richness (1, 2, 3, and 4 functional groups). The field site is located on the floodplain of the Saale river at the northern edge of Jena (Thuringia, Germany). Photo by Christoph Scherber, Winfried Voigt, Alexandra Weigelt & the Jena Experiment. The lower photograph shows the nematode Mononchus sp., a predator species found at the field site of the Jena Experiment. Photo by René Seiml-Buchklinger.
Design of the Jena Experiment.
| Plant species richness | ||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 60 | Plots | ||
| Plant functional group richness | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Plots |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Combinations of plant species and plant functional group richness, and the number of plots per diversity level at the Jena Experiment field site (see Table S2 for more details). Plots sampled in autumn 2005 are given in italics and plots sampled in spring 2007 are given in bold (brackets). For more details on the design of the Jena Experiment see Roscher et al. (2004).
Plant community effects on nematodes.
| BL | SR | FR | GR | SH | TH | LE | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Nematode density | 2.76 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0.00 | |
| Plant feeders | 3.13 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.71 | |
| Bacterial feeders | 3.15 | 0.86 | 0.18 |
| 0.09 | 0.21 | 2.92 | |
| Fungal feeders | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.21 | |
| Predators | 0.36 | 2.25 | 0.28 | 2.10 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 0.27 | |
| Omnivores | 6.60 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 2.37 | 0.00 | |
| Nematode richness | 5.09 |
| 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| Rare | 5.78 | 0.05 | 0.59 | 0.01 |
| 0.05 | 0.45 | |
| Intermediate | 2.17 | 0.29 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.21 | |
| Common | 3.00 |
| 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.98 | |
|
| 1.47 | 0.51 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.02 | |
|
| 12.12 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 1.35 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 0.40 | |
|
| 2.75 |
| 0.21 | 1.45 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 | |
|
| 1.70 | 0.01 | 1.53 | 0.19 |
| 0.55 | 0.08 | |
|
| 7.48 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 2.31 | 0.44 | |
| Shannon-Wiener index | 2.69 |
| 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 1.77 | |
| Maturity index | 4.16 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 1.53 | 0.50 | 2.48 | 0.27 | |
| Channel index | 2.67 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.40 | |
| Enrichment index | 0.71 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 1.18 | 1.09 | 0.54 | |
| Structure index | 3.04 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.01 | |
| FF/(FF+BF) | 2.39 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 0.47 | 0.03 | 0.84 | |
| (FF+BF)/PF | 1.90 | 0.41 | 0.05 | 3.12 | 1.13 | 0.10 | 1.20 | |
| PR/PF | 2.78 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 3.77 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Nematode density | 0.03 | 1.36 | 0.32 | 2.16 | 0.19 | 1.61 | 1.12 | |
| Plant feeders | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.10 | |
| Bacterial feeders | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.50 | |
| Fungal feeders | 1.61 |
| 1.67 | 0.78 | 3.25 | 2.31 | 1.62 | |
| Predators | 0.00 |
| 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.08 | |
| Omnivores | 4.11 | 1.90 | 0.12 | 0.91 | 0.47 | 0.15 | 0.49 | |
| FF/(BF+FF) | 2.98 |
| 2.25 | 0.79 | 2.82 | 2.64 | 0.63 | |
| (FF+BF)/PF | 0.13 | 1.35 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.38 | |
| PR/PF | 2.33 |
| 0.26 | 0.74 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
F-values of GLMs for the effect of block (BL), plant species richness (SR), plant functional group richness (FG), presence/absence of grasses (GR), small herbs (SH), tall herbs (TH) and legumes on total nematode density and on the density of different trophic groups of nematodes (autumn 2005 and spring 2007), the ratio between fungal feeders (FF) and bacterial feeders (BF; autumn 2005 and spring 2007), the ratio between FF+BF and plant feeders (PF), the ratio between predators (PR) and plant feeders, nematode taxon richness, nematode taxon richness of rare, intermediate and common taxa, and of taxa belonging to different colonizer-persister groups [12], [34], Shannon-Wiener index, maturity index, channel index enrichment index and structure index (all in autumn 2005).
Significant effects (P≤0.05) are given in bold. n2005 = 73, n2007 = 22, degrees of freedom: BL = 3 (2005) or 1 (2007), SR, FR, GR, SH, TH, LE = 1;
↑ = increase with increasing plant species richness,
↓ = decrease in the presence of a certain plant functional group,
*** = P≤0.001,
** = P≤0.01,
* = P≤0.05.
Figure 2Plant diversity effects on nematode trophic groups.
Effect of plant species richness on the density of (A, B) total nematodes, (C, D) bacterial feeders, (E, F) fungal feeders, (G, H) plant feeders, (I, J) predators, and (K, L) omnivores [log10 (number g−1 soil dry weight)] in autumn 2005 (A, C, E, G, I, K) and spring 2007 (B, D, F, H, J, L). Means ± standard error; * = significant (P≤0.05), cat = categorical factor, con = continuous factor. Darker shading of green indicates increasing plant species richness.
Figure 3Plant diversity effects on nematode taxon richness.
Effect of plant species richness on the taxon richness of (A) common nematode taxa (see text for details) and (B) taxa belonging to the colonizer-persister group 3 (see text for details) in autumn 2005. Means ± standard error; * = significant (P≤0.05). Darker shading of green indicates increasing plant species richness.
Figure 4Plant diversity effects on the functional composition of nematode communities.
Effect of plant species richness on the ratio between predators and plant feeders in (A) autumn 2005 and (B) spring 2007, and between fungal and bacterial feeders in (C) autumn 2005 and (D) spring 2007. Darker shading of green indicates increasing plant species richness. Ratio between (E) predators and plant feeders, (F) fungal and bacterial feeders, and (G) microbivore nematodes (bacterial and fungal feeders) and plant feeders in autumn 2005 and spring 2007. (H) Ratio between microbivore nematodes and plant feeders in spring 2007 as affected by plant species richness. The horizontal line in (G) and (H) represents a ratio of 1.0, i.e. neutral net effects of nematodes on plant productivity [38], [39]. Ratios <1.0 indicate negative net effects (lower plant productivity; given in red), and ratios >1.0 indicate positive net effects (higher plant productivity; given in blue). Levels of significance on lines (E, F, G) indicate differences between years (Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test) and those on bars (G, H) differences from 1.0 (one-sample t-test). Means ± standard deviation; ns = not significant, * = significant (P≤0.05).