| Literature DB >> 21909297 |
Jia-Hua Zhang1, Feng-Mei Yao, Cheng Liu, Li-Min Yang, Vijendra K Boken.
Abstract
Forest fires have major impact on ecosystems and greatly impact the amount of greenhouse gases and aerosols in the atmosphere. This paper presents an overview in the forest fire detection, emission estimation, and fire risk prediction in China using satellite imagery, climate data, and various simulation models over the past three decades. Since the 1980s, remotely-sensed data acquired by many satellites, such as NOAA/AVHRR, FY-series, MODIS, CBERS, and ENVISAT, have been widely utilized for detecting forest fire hot spots and burned areas in China. Some developed algorithms have been utilized for detecting the forest fire hot spots at a sub-pixel level. With respect to modeling the forest burning emission, a remote sensing data-driven Net Primary productivity (NPP) estimation model was developed for estimating forest biomass and fuel. In order to improve the forest fire risk modeling in China, real-time meteorological data, such as surface temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and direction, have been used as the model input for improving prediction of forest fire occurrence and its behavior. Shortwave infrared (SWIR) and near infrared (NIR) channels of satellite sensors have been employed for detecting live fuel moisture content (FMC), and the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) was used for evaluating the forest vegetation condition and its moisture status.Entities:
Keywords: China; fire emission estimation; forest fire detection; forest fire risk model; satellite remote sensing
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21909297 PMCID: PMC3166733 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8083156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1.Daxing’anling forest fire hot-spot and burnt area detection by using NOAA/AVHRR.
The channel characteristics for detecting forest fire by using MVISR sensor onboard FY-1C/1D satellite.
| 1 | 0.58–0.68 | 1.1 | 0–90% | S/N ≥ 3 (ρ = 0.5%) | Burnt area |
| 2 | 0.84–0.89 | 1.1 | 0–90% | S/N ≥ 3 (ρ = 0.5%) | Burnt area |
| 3 | 3.55–3.95 | 1.1 | 190–340 K | NEΔ | Hot-spot |
| 4 | 10.3–11.3 | 1.1 | 190–330 K | NEΔ | Hot-spot |
| 5 | 11.5–12.5 | 1.1 | 190–330 K | NEΔ | Burnt area |
S/N: signal to noise ratio; ρ: reflectivity; NEΔT: Noise-Equivalent Temperature Difference.
Figure 2.The basic flow of the forest fire detection procedure based on FY1-C/D satellites data.
The channel characteristics of VISSR onboard FY-2C/2D satellites.
| 1 | 0.5–0.9 | 1.25 | 0–98% | 0.5ρ = 2.5% | Burnt area | |
| 2 | 3.5–4.0 | 5 | 180–330 K | 0.6–0.5 | Hot-spot | |
| 3 | 6.3–7.6 | 5 | 180–280 K | 0.5–0.3 | Water vapor | |
| 4 | 10.3–11.3 | 5 | 180–330 K | 0.4–0.2 | Hot-spot | |
| 5 | 11.5–12.5 | 5 | 180–330 K | 0.4–0.2 | Burnt area |
ρ: reflectivity; S/N: signal to noise ratio.
Figure 3.Forest fire hot spot detecting flow chart using FY-2C/2D satellites data.
Figure 4.Forest fires hot spot monitoring hourly by using FY-2C satellite data.
The CBERS payloads, sensors and channels characteristics.
| Sensor Type | Push-broom | Electro-mechanic | Push-broom |
| Visible and near infrared bands (μm) | 1: 0.45–0.52 | 6: 0.50–0.90 | 10: 0.63–0.69 |
| Shortwave infrared bands (μm) | 7: 1.55–1.75 | ||
| Thermal infrared bands (μm) | 9: 10.4–12.5 | ||
| Resolution (m) | 19.5 | Band 6–8: 78 | 258 |
| View angle | 8.32° | 8.80° | 59.6° |
| Swath wide (km) | 113 | 119.5 | 890 |
CCD: Charge Coupled Device Camera; IRMSS: Infrared Multi-Spectral Scanner; WFI: Wide Field Imager.
Figure 5.Forest fire hot spot detection using EOS/MODIS in Northern China.
Figure 6.Forest fire emissions estimation system in China.