Literature DB >> 21908888

Does a 'no-touch' technique result in better vein patency?

Amir H Sepehripour1, Omar A Jarral, Alex R Shipolini, David J McCormack.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether harvesting the saphenous vein (SV) as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using a no-touch technique would result in better patency rates. This technique involves the harvest of the SV with a pedicle of peri-vascular tissue left intact and the avoidance of distension of the vein prior to anastomosis. A total of 405 papers were found using the reported searches of which eight represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. The studies found analysed the ultrastructural and mechanical properties of the endothelium and vessel walls of the two harvesting techniques; the protein and enzymatic expression and activity observed; the early atherosclerotic changes detected; and the overall patency of the grafts during short- and long-term angiographical follow-up. Three small prospectively randomised studies compared the patency of grafts harvested using the two techniques and found significant improvements in graft patency using the no-touch harvesting technique in comparison to both the conventional technique and more importantly comparable to the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) patency. The most favourable difference was that of graft patency after 8.5 years of follow-up [90% vs. 76% (P = 0.01), LITA patency 90%], and incidence of graft stenosis [11% vs. 25% (P = 0.006)]. These findings were supported by the demonstrated improvements in the cellular integrity of the vessels and the reduction in the mechanisms leading to graft failure seen in the no-touch harvested SV grafts. These morphological and cellular analyses were carried by five small comparative studies, demonstrating improved endothelial integrity and reduced injury, decelerated atherosclerotic processes, intact adventitial collagen layers, increase in the total area of vasa vasorum, elevated endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and activity, and increased peri-vascular leptin levels and activity. We conclude that there are clear enhancements in vessel wall properties at a cellular level and angiographical evidence of superior graft patency when the no-touch SV harvesting technique is employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21908888     DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2011.281998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  12 in total

Review 1.  Conduits Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Morphological Studies.

Authors:  Brenda Martínez-González; Cynthia Guadalupe Reyes-Hernández; Alejandro Quiroga-Garza; Víctor E Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Claudia N Esparza-Hernández; Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña; Santos Guzmán-López
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  Does No-Touch Technique Better than Conventional or Intermediate Saphenous Vein Harvest Techniques for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Elshafay; Ahmed Hesham Bendary; Huan Thanh Vuong; Ahmed Reda Ahmed; Mohamed Ashraf Mokhtar; Ali Lotfy Soliman; Nguyen Lam Vuong; Israa Atia El Bestawi; Nirmeen Atef Abdallah; Vi Tuong Vu; Kenji Hirayama; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Gene therapy for the prevention of vein graft disease.

Authors:  Kevin W Southerland; Sarah B Frazier; Dawn E Bowles; Carmelo A Milano; Christopher D Kontos
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 7.012

4.  Pressure applied during surgery alters the biomechanical properties of human saphenous vein graft.

Authors:  Necla Ozturk; Nehir Sucu; Ulku Comelekoglu; Banu Coskun Yilmaz; Barlas Naim Aytacoglu; Ozden Vezir
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  An innovative panel to assess endothelial integrity of pedicled and skeletonized internal thoracic artery used as aortocoronary bypass graft: a randomized comparative histologic and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Mateusz Puslecki; Piotr Buczkowski; Michał Nowicki; Patrycja Sujka-Kordowska; Marcin Ligowski; Marcin Misterski; Sebastian Stefaniak; Marek Dąbrowski; Agata Dabrowska; Michal Bocianski; Lukasz Szarpak; Kurt Ruetzler; Marek Jemielity; Bartlomiej Perek
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Coronary Artery Bypass: Review of Surgical Techniques and Impact on Long-Term Revascularization Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian McNichols; John R Spratt; Jerin George; Scott Rizzi; Eddie W Manning; Ki Park
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 7.  A comprehensive review on learning curve associated problems in endoscopic vein harvesting and the requirement for a standardised training programme.

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy; William R Critchley; Rajamiyer V Venkateswaran; James Barnard; Ann Caress; James E Fildes; Nizar Yonan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Comparison of the one-year patency rates of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas created using no-touch versus conventional technique.

Authors:  İsmail Oral Hastaoğlu; Hamdi Toköz; Ayça Özgen; Fuat Bilgen
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 0.332

9.  Arterial shear stress reduces eph-b4 expression in adult human veins.

Authors:  Lynn S Model; Michael R Hall; Daniel J Wong; Akihito Muto; Yuka Kondo; Kenneth R Ziegler; Amanda Feigel; Clay Quint; Laura Niklason; Alan Dardik
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2014-09-03

10.  Standard Surgical Skin Markers Should Be Avoided for Intraoperative Vein Graft Marking during Cardiac and Peripheral Bypass Operations.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Colleen Marie Brophy
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.