Literature DB >> 21908838

Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum.

Kathleen A FitzPatrick1, Kevin E Finn, Jay Campisi.   

Abstract

To increase student engagement, active participation, and performance, personal response systems (clickers) were incorporated into six lecture-based sections of four required courses within the Health Sciences Department major curriculum: freshman-level Anatomy and Physiology I and II, junior-level Exercise Physiology, and senior-level Human Pathophysiology. Clickers were used to gather anonymous student responses to questions posed within the class period after individual thought and peer discussion. Students (n = 293, 88% of students completing the courses) completed a perceptual survey on clicker effectiveness inserted into the Student Assessment of Learning Gains online instrument. Across courses and years, students uniformly rated several dimensions of clicker use as providing good to great gain in engaging them in active learning, increasing participation and involvement during class, maintaining attention, applying material immediately, providing feedback concerning their understanding, and offering an anonymous format for participation. Within these four sections, quiz grades were compared between clicker and nonclicker years. Significant increases in pre- and posttest scores were seen in Exercise Physiology in clicker years and on some, but not all material, in Anatomy and Physiology I and II based on content quizzes. Human Pathophysiology results were unexpected, with higher quiz scores in the nonclicker year. The results support the hypothesis of increased engagement with clicker use. The hypothesis of increased student performance was not consistently supported. Increased performance was seen in Exercise Physiology. In Anatomy and Physiology I and II, performance improved on some content quizzes. In Human Pathophysiology, performance did not improve with clickers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21908838     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00036.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of interactive teaching for undergraduate medical students using a classroom interactive response system in India.

Authors:  Rakesh Datta; Karuna Datta; M D Venkatesh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-06-19

2.  Use of remote response devices: an effective interactive method in the long- term learning.

Authors:  Maite Millor; Jon Etxano; Pedro Slon; Paula García-Barquín; Alberto Villanueva; Gorka Bastarrika; Jesús Ciro Pueyo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course.

Authors:  Stefanie P Ferreri; Shanna K O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Interactive patient education via an audience response system in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Dietrich Stoevesandt; Andreas Weber; Andreas Wienke; Steffi Bethge; Viktoria Heinze; Simone Kowoll; Axel Schlitt
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-08-25

5.  Indicators of satisfaction in clickers-aided EFL class.

Authors:  Zhonggen Yu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-06

6.  Student perceptions of gamified audience response system interactions in large group lectures and via lecture capture technology.

Authors:  Robin K Pettit; Lise McCoy; Marjorie Kinney; Frederic N Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  A model for the use of blended learning in large group teaching sessions.

Authors:  Cristan Herbert; Gary M Velan; Wendy M Pryor; Rakesh K Kumar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students.

Authors:  Maria J Casuso-Holgado; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Noelia Moreno-Morales; Maria T Labajos-Manzanares; Francisco J Barón-López; Manuel Vega-Cuesta
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Student evaluation of clickers in a dental pathology course.

Authors:  Carmen Llena; Leopoldo Forner; Roger Cueva
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-07-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.