Literature DB >> 21908754

Contingency management treatment in substance abusers with and without legal problems.

Nancy M Petry1, Carla J Rash, Caroline J Easton.   

Abstract

Drug and alcohol abusers frequently have legal difficulties, and the legal system often provides negative reinforcement for substance abuse treatment. In contrast, contingency management (CM) treatments utilize positive reinforcement procedures to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluated whether substance-abusing patients with legal problems at treatment entry had differential outcomes, in general and in response to CM, compared with those without legal problems. Data from three randomized CM trials (n = 393) were used in an evaluation of main and interactive effects of legal status and treatment condition, with respect to retention and abstinence. Compared with patients without legal difficulties, those with legal problems remained in treatment for shorter durations and achieved shorter periods of abstinence. CM was positively and significantly associated with longer durations of abstinence, regardless of legal status. Results suggest that substance abusers with legal problems have generally poor outcomes, but that CM is effective regardless of the patient's legal status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21908754      PMCID: PMC3616315     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law        ISSN: 1093-6793


  31 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive guide to the application of contingency management procedures in clinical settings.

Authors:  N M Petry
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Reinforcing compliance with non-drug-related activities.

Authors:  N M Petry; J Tedford; B Martin
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2001-01

Review 3.  The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley; Paula Diehr; Scott Emerson; Lu Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 4.  The social ecology of alcohol treatment in the United States.

Authors:  C Weisner
Journal:  Recent Dev Alcohol       Date:  1987

5.  New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

Authors:  A T McLellan; L Luborsky; J Cacciola; J Griffith; F Evans; H L Barr; C P O'Brien
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine- and opioid-abusing methadone patients.

Authors:  Nancy M Petry; Bonnie Martin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-04

7.  Substance abuse treatment characteristics of probation-referred young adults in a community-based outpatient program.

Authors:  Rajita Sinha; Caroline Easton; Kathleen Kemp
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.829

8.  Group-based randomized trial of contingencies for health and abstinence in HIV patients.

Authors:  Nancy M Petry; Jeremiah Weinstock; Sheila M Alessi; Marilyn W Lewis; Kevin Dieckhaus
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-02

9.  Participation and retention in drug abuse treatment services research.

Authors:  Thomas Vaughn; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Shadi S Saleh; Diane L Huber; James A Hall
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2002-12

10.  Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: how low can we go, and with whom?

Authors:  Nancy M Petry; Jacqueline Tedford; Mark Austin; Charla Nich; Kathleen M Carroll; Bruce J Rounsaville
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Contingency management treatment for substance use disorders: How far has it come, and where does it need to go?

Authors:  Nancy M Petry; Sheila M Alessi; Todd A Olmstead; Carla J Rash; Kristyn Zajac
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2017-06-22

2.  Criminal justice referral and incentives in outpatient substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Anthony DeFulio; Maxine Stitzer; John Roll; Nancy Petry; Paul Nuzzo; Robert P Schwartz; Patricia Stabile
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-02-19

3.  Contingency Management Abstinence Incentives: Cost and Implications for Treatment Tailoring.

Authors:  Colin Cunningham; Maxine Stitzer; Aimee N C Campbell; Martina Pavlicova; Mei-Chen Hu; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2015-09-21

4.  Substance Abuse Treatment Patients in Housing Programs Respond to Contingency Management Interventions.

Authors:  Carla J Rash; Sheila M Alessi; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2016-07-19

5.  Considerations for Implementing Contingency Management in Substance Abuse Treatment Clinics: The Veterans Affairs Initiative as a Model.

Authors:  Carla J Rash; Dominick DePhilippis
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-06-26

6.  Initial abstinence status and contingency management treatment outcomes: does race matter?

Authors:  LaTrice Montgomery; Kathleen M Carroll; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23

7.  Nationwide dissemination of contingency management: the Veterans Administration initiative.

Authors:  Nancy M Petry; Dominick DePhilippis; Carla J Rash; Michelle Drapkin; James R McKay
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2014 May-Jun

Review 8.  Lost in translation? Moving contingency management and cognitive behavioral therapy into clinical practice.

Authors:  Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Income received during treatment does not affect response to contingency management treatments in cocaine-dependent outpatients.

Authors:  Carla J Rash; Leonardo F Andrade; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.