Anne Marie Mackintosh1, Crawford Moodie, Gerard Hastings. 1. Centre for Tobacco Control Research, Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirlingshire FK9 4LA, United Kingdom. a.m.mackintosh@stir.ac.uk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: According to tobacco industry documents, tobacco displays within the retail environment assume a much greater importance with the loss of other marketing channels. The impact of these displays upon young people and their future intentions to smoke (susceptibility) is, therefore, of significant interest to public health. METHODS: A cross-sectional in-home survey was conducted in 2008 with young people (N = 1,401) aged 11-16 years, recruited from across the United Kingdom. We examine the salience of and attraction to cigarette displays at point-of-sale (POS), among youth, and whether this is associated with susceptibility. We concentrate exclusively on the 956 never-smokers. RESULTS: Logistic regression, controlling for known risk factors of youth smoking, found that noticing cigarette displays was associated with higher levels of susceptibility (odds ratio [OR] = 1.77, p < .05) and greater attraction to displays was associated with higher susceptibility (OR = 1.07, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult, if not impossible, to safeguard young people from exposure to displays of tobacco at POS. That these displays were associated with increased susceptibility suggests that moves to place tobacco out of sight in the United Kingdom, and elsewhere, are justified.
INTRODUCTION: According to tobacco industry documents, tobacco displays within the retail environment assume a much greater importance with the loss of other marketing channels. The impact of these displays upon young people and their future intentions to smoke (susceptibility) is, therefore, of significant interest to public health. METHODS: A cross-sectional in-home survey was conducted in 2008 with young people (N = 1,401) aged 11-16 years, recruited from across the United Kingdom. We examine the salience of and attraction to cigarette displays at point-of-sale (POS), among youth, and whether this is associated with susceptibility. We concentrate exclusively on the 956 never-smokers. RESULTS: Logistic regression, controlling for known risk factors of youth smoking, found that noticing cigarette displays was associated with higher levels of susceptibility (odds ratio [OR] = 1.77, p < .05) and greater attraction to displays was associated with higher susceptibility (OR = 1.07, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult, if not impossible, to safeguard young people from exposure to displays of tobacco at POS. That these displays were associated with increased susceptibility suggests that moves to place tobacco out of sight in the United Kingdom, and elsewhere, are justified.
Authors: Dennis R Trinidad; John P Pierce; James D Sargent; Martha M White; David R Strong; David B Portnoy; Victoria R Green; Cassandra A Stanton; Kelvin Choi; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Yuyan Shi; Jennifer L Pearson; Annette R Kaufman; Nicolette Borek; Blair N Coleman; Andrew Hyland; Charles Carusi; Sheila Kealey; Eric Leas; Madison L Noble; Karen Messer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Juliet P Lee; Roland S Moore; Jennifer Roberts; Nadeana Nelson; Daniel Calac; David A Gilder; Cindy L Ehlers Journal: J Ethn Subst Abuse Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 1.507
Authors: Michelle Jeong; Marin K Kurti; Mary Hrywna; Christopher Ackerman; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Yuliyana Beleva; James Russell Pike; Stephen Miller; Bin Xie; Susan L Ames; Alan W Stacy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Eunyoung Y Song; Jessica L King; Kathleen L Egan; Beata Debinski; Mark Wolfson; John Spangler; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.244