OBJECTIVES: Adults older than 50 years are at greater risk for death and severe disability from influenza. Persons in this age group, however, are frequently not vaccinated, despite extensive efforts by physicians to provide this preventive measure in primary care settings. We performed this study to determine if influenza vaccination of older adults in the emergency department (ED) may be cost-effective. METHODS: Using a probabilistic decision model with quasi-Markov modeling of a typical influenza season, we calculated costs and health outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of patients using parameters from the literature. Three ED-based intervention strategies were compared: (1) no vaccination offered, (2) vaccination offered to patients older than 65 years (limited strategy), and (3) vaccination offered to all patients who are 50 years and older (inclusive strategy). Outcomes were measured as costs, lives saved, and incremental costs per life saved. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Vaccination of patients 50 years of age and older results in an incremental cost of $34,610 per life saved when compared with the no-vaccination strategy. Limiting vaccination to only those older than 65 years results in an incremental cost of $13,084 per life saved. Results were sensitive to changes in vaccine cost but were insensitive to changes in other model parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination of older adults against influenza in the ED setting is cost-effective, especially for those older than 65 years. Emergency departments may be an important setting for providing influenza vaccination to adults who may otherwise have remained unvaccinated.
OBJECTIVES: Adults older than 50 years are at greater risk for death and severe disability from influenza. Persons in this age group, however, are frequently not vaccinated, despite extensive efforts by physicians to provide this preventive measure in primary care settings. We performed this study to determine if influenza vaccination of older adults in the emergency department (ED) may be cost-effective. METHODS: Using a probabilistic decision model with quasi-Markov modeling of a typical influenza season, we calculated costs and health outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of patients using parameters from the literature. Three ED-based intervention strategies were compared: (1) no vaccination offered, (2) vaccination offered to patients older than 65 years (limited strategy), and (3) vaccination offered to all patients who are 50 years and older (inclusive strategy). Outcomes were measured as costs, lives saved, and incremental costs per life saved. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Vaccination of patients 50 years of age and older results in an incremental cost of $34,610 per life saved when compared with the no-vaccination strategy. Limiting vaccination to only those older than 65 years results in an incremental cost of $13,084 per life saved. Results were sensitive to changes in vaccine cost but were insensitive to changes in other model parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination of older adults against influenza in the ED setting is cost-effective, especially for those older than 65 years. Emergency departments may be an important setting for providing influenza vaccination to adults who may otherwise have remained unvaccinated.
Authors: Noelle-Angelique M Molinari; Ismael R Ortega-Sanchez; Mark L Messonnier; William W Thompson; Pascale M Wortley; Eric Weintraub; Carolyn B Bridges Journal: Vaccine Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: William G Fernandez; Leslie Oyama; Patricia Mitchell; Erika M Edwards; Jill St George; Jacqueline Donovan; James A Feldman Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Lisa A Prosser; Megan A O'Brien; Noelle-Angelique M Molinari; Katherine H Hohman; Kristin L Nichol; Mark L Messonnier; Tracy A Lieu Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Michael V Maciosek; Leif I Solberg; Ashley B Coffield; Nichol M Edwards; Michael J Goodman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jonathan Dushoff; Joshua B Plotkin; Cecile Viboud; David J D Earn; Lone Simonsen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-11-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Anthony E Fiore; David K Shay; Karen Broder; John K Iskander; Timothy M Uyeki; Gina Mootrey; Joseph S Bresee; Nancy S Cox Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2008-08-08
Authors: Andrew J Leidner; Neil Murthy; Harrell W Chesson; Matthew Biggerstaff; Charles Stoecker; Aaron M Harris; Anna Acosta; Kathleen Dooling; Carolyn B Bridges Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Rebecca J Hart; Michelle D Stevenson; Michael J Smith; A Scott LaJoie; Keith Cross Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Piyameth Dilokthornsakul; Le My Lan; Ammarin Thakkinstian; Raymond Hutubessy; Philipp Lambach; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-04-21