Literature DB >> 21907727

Use of satiety peptides in assessing the satiating capacity of foods.

Monica Mars1, Annette Stafleu, Cees de Graaf.   

Abstract

Foods differ in their satiating capacity. Satiety peptides may help to provide evidence for biological mechanisms behind these differences. The aim of this paper was to discuss the physiological relevance of three individual appetite peptides, i.e. CCK, GLP-1 and PYY, in assessing the satiating capacity of foods. A literature research was conducted on CCK, GLP-1, PYY and satiety; effective exogenous infusion studies and endogenous production studies, i.e. changes induced by foods, were identified. The relative changes in blood concentrations in these studies were compared in order to assess an indication of the physiological relevance of the peptides. Relative changes in the two types of studies investigating CCK overlapped, i.e. increases in serum were 3 to 14-fold in effective exogenous studies (n=7) and 2 to 8-fold in endogenous production studies (n=9). The relative changes in GLP-1 and PYY did not overlap; GLP-1: 4 to 16 fold in effective exogenous studies (n=4) and no effect to 4 fold in endogenous production studies (n=38). PYY: 3 to 11-fold in effective exogenous studies (n=14) and no effect to 2-fold in endogenous production studies (n=10). GLP-1 and PYY show effects on satiety at supra-physiological dosages, they are not likely to contribute individually to a difference in satiating capacity of foods and can therefore not be interpreted in isolation. The effects of CCK are likely to be in the physiological range and therefore may have an individual contribution to a difference in satiating capacity between foods.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907727     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Macronutrients, Appetite, and Energy Intake.

Authors:  Alicia L Carreiro; Jaapna Dhillon; Susannah Gordon; Kelly A Higgins; Ashley G Jacobs; Breanna M McArthur; Benjamin W Redan; Rebecca L Rivera; Leigh R Schmidt; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Comparable effects of breakfast meals varying in protein source on appetite and subsequent energy intake in healthy males.

Authors:  Anestis Dougkas; Elin Östman
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 3.  Appetite responses to high-fat meals or diets of varying fatty acid composition: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  S Kaviani; J A Cooper
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Small intestinal protein infusion in humans: evidence for a location-specific gradient in intestinal feedback on food intake and GI peptide release.

Authors:  M van Avesaat; D Ripken; H F J Hendriks; A A M Masclee; F J Troost
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 5.  Prevention of type 2 diabetes through lifestyle modification: is there a role for higher-protein diets?

Authors:  Amy Y Liu; Marta P Silvestre; Sally D Poppitt
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  Contribution of macronutrients to obesity: implications for precision nutrition.

Authors:  Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; José María Ordovas; José Alfredo Martínez
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Milk protein for improved metabolic health: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Robin A McGregor; Sally D Poppitt
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.169

8.  The sum of its parts--effects of gastric distention, nutrient content and sensory stimulation on brain activation.

Authors:  Maartje S Spetter; Cees de Graaf; Monica Mars; Max A Viergever; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Habitual Breakfast Patterns Do Not Influence Appetite and Satiety Responses in Normal vs. High-Protein Breakfasts in Overweight Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Steve M Douglas; Adam W Byers; Heather J Leidy
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses to Food Cues: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marlou P Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.