Literature DB >> 21907474

The implementation of a global fund grant in Lesotho: applying a framework on knowledge absorptive capacity.

Regien Biesma1, Elsie Makoa2, Regina Mpemi3, Lineo Tsekoa4, Philip Odonkor5, Ruairi Brugha6.   

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges in scaling up health interventions in sub-Saharan Africa for government recipients is to effectively manage the rapid influx of aid from different donors, each with its own requirements and conditions. However, there is little empirical evidence on how governments absorb knowledge from new donors in order to satisfy their requirements. This case study applies Cuellar and Gallivan's (2006) framework on knowledge absorptive capacity (AC) to illustrate how recipient government organisations in Lesotho identified, assimilated and utilised knowledge on how to meet the disbursement and reporting requirements of Lesotho's Round 5 grant from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (Global Fund). In-depth topic guided interviews with 22 respondents and document reviews were conducted between July 2008 and February 2009. Analysis focused on six organisational determinants that affect an organisation's absorptive capacity: prior-related knowledge, combinative capabilities, motivation, organisational structure, cultural match, and communication channels. Absorptive capacity was mostly evident at the level of the Principal Recipient, the Ministry of Finance, who established a new organisational unit to meet the requirements of Global Fund Grants, while the level of AC was less advanced among the Ministry of Health (Sub-Recipient) and district level implementers. Recipient organisations can increase their absorptive capacity, not only through prior knowledge of donor requirements, but also by deliberately changing their organisational form and through combinative capabilities. The study also revealed how vulnerable African governments are to loss of staff capacity. The application of organisational theory to analyse the interactions of donor agencies with public and non-public country stakeholders illustrates the complexity of the environment that aid recipient governments have to manage.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907474     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  District Health Officer Perceptions of PEPFAR's Influence on the Health System in Uganda, 2005-2011.

Authors:  Nathaniel Lohman; Amy Hagopian; Samuel Abimerech Luboga; Bert Stover; Travis Lim; Frederick Makumbi; Noah Kiwanuka; Flavia Lubega; Assay Ndizihiwe; Eddie Mukooyo; Scott Barnhart; James Pfeiffer
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  How did rapid scale-up of HIV services impact on workplace and interpersonal trust in Zambian primary health centres: a case-based health systems analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie M Topp; Julien M Chipukuma
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2016-12-16

3.  Implementing Global Fund programs: a survey of opinions and experiences of the Principal Recipients across 69 countries.

Authors:  Francis Wafula; Charles Marwa; David McCoy
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.185

4.  Health technology assessments as a mechanism for increased value for money: recommendations to the Global Fund.

Authors:  Yot Teerawattananon; Kate McQueston; Amanda Glassman; Jomkwan Yothasamut; Chaw Yin Myint
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.185

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.