Literature DB >> 21907412

Courts' misplaced confidence in psychiatric diagnoses.

Graham W Mellsop1, Debra Fraser, Rees Tapsell, David B Menkes.   

Abstract

In considering psychiatric evidence, criminal justice systems make considerable use of labels from official psychiatric classificatory systems. There are legislated requirements for psychological and/or behavioural phenomena to be addressed in legal tests, however medico-legal use of the current categorical diagnostic frameworks which are increasingly complex is difficult to justify. The lack of validity in large domains of the present classificatory systems is now more openly acknowledged, prompting a critical rethink. Illustrative examples include post-traumatic stress disorder, various personality disorders, and dissociative identity disorder. It follows that the Courts' faith in the present categorical classifications (e.g., DSMIV and ICD10) is misplaced and may be ultimately unhelpful to the administration of justice.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907412     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-2527


  2 in total

Review 1.  Personality disorders at the interface of psychiatry and the law: legal use and clinical classification.

Authors:  Sally C Johnson; Eric B Elbogen
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.986

2.  Neither mad nor bad? The classification of antisocial personality disorder among formerly incarcerated adults.

Authors:  Jason Schnittker; Savannah H Larimore; Hedwig Lee
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.634

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.