P J Aspinall1. 1. Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, George Allen Wing, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK. P.J.Aspinall@kent.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility and validity of the ethnicity categorizations across the 1991, 2001 and 2011 British Censuses for public health purposes. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. METHODS: A review of journal literature and census and other policy reports was undertaken to assess specified criteria for the utility and validity of the 1991, 2001 and 2011 Censuses for public health. RESULTS: The census ethnicity categorization satisfactorily captures the ethnic diversity of the population, and adheres to the principle of self-identification in the labels used and underlying conceptual base. The stability of some of the categories (especially 'Black' groups and 'Mixed') continues to be problematic for public health. Concealed heterogeneity has been partially addressed in the 'White' group but remains in the 'Black African' group. Colour categories ('White' and 'Black') have been retained in the 2011 Census, with only limited objection amongst the communities they describe. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of the classifications and range of data on the dimensions of ethnicity have increased over the three decades. The breakdown of the 'Black African' group, the shortcomings of 'Mixed' categorization, and the way in which the 'White' category is subdivided require further investigation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility and validity of the ethnicity categorizations across the 1991, 2001 and 2011 British Censuses for public health purposes. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. METHODS: A review of journal literature and census and other policy reports was undertaken to assess specified criteria for the utility and validity of the 1991, 2001 and 2011 Censuses for public health. RESULTS: The census ethnicity categorization satisfactorily captures the ethnic diversity of the population, and adheres to the principle of self-identification in the labels used and underlying conceptual base. The stability of some of the categories (especially 'Black' groups and 'Mixed') continues to be problematic for public health. Concealed heterogeneity has been partially addressed in the 'White' group but remains in the 'Black African' group. Colour categories ('White' and 'Black') have been retained in the 2011 Census, with only limited objection amongst the communities they describe. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of the classifications and range of data on the dimensions of ethnicity have increased over the three decades. The breakdown of the 'Black African' group, the shortcomings of 'Mixed' categorization, and the way in which the 'White' category is subdivided require further investigation.
Authors: Maria-Elena Planas; Patricia J García; Monserrat Bustelo; Cesar P Carcamo; Sebastian Martinez; Hugo Nopo; Julio Rodriguez; Maria-Fernanda Merino; Andrew Morrison Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: James B Kirkbride; Yasir Hameed; Konstantinos Ioannidis; Gayatri Ankireddypalli; Carolyn M Crane; Mukhtar Nasir; Nikolett Kabacs; Antonio Metastasio; Oliver Jenkins; Ashkan Espandian; Styliani Spyridi; Danica Ralevic; Suneetha Siddabattuni; Ben Walden; Adewale Adeoye; Jesus Perez; Peter B Jones Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Lesley Smith; Paul Norman; Melpo Kapetanstrataki; Sarah Fleming; Lorna K Fraser; Roger C Parslow; Richard G Feltbower Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: E Copson; T Maishman; S Gerty; B Eccles; L Stanton; R I Cutress; D G Altman; L Durcan; P Simmonds; L Jones; W Tapper; Diana Eccles Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 7.640