OBJECTIVE: Concerns have been raised about gynecologists as vaccinators. This survey evaluated use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, attitudes, and barriers among gynecologists and family practitioners for differences between the 2 specialties. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 50-item, self-administered questionnaire mailed to participants. SETTING: The study was conducted in Virginia through the University of Virginia Center for Survey Research. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to 500 family practitioners and 500 gynecologists. INTERVENTIONS: The questionnaire asked provider and practice demographics, vaccine practices, knowledge, HPV vaccine attitudes, and barriers to vaccination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared gynecologists to family practitioners for the outcome of offering HPV vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with providers choosing to offer and recommend the HPV vaccine. RESULTS: After exclusion of ineligible physicians, 385 of 790 doctors responded (48.7%). Seventy percent of family practitioners and 73.5% of gynecologists currently offer the HPV vaccine. There were no significant differences in demographics or practice patterns between the specialties. The most frequent barrier to vaccination reported by both groups was reimbursement. In multivariate logistic regression, inadequate reimbursement was negatively associated with offering the HPV vaccine (odds ratio [OR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-1.1) and with recommending the vaccine to patients (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.26-0.76). Experience treating HPV- related disease was positively associated with offering the HPV vaccine (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologists are providing HPV vaccination at rates similar to family practitioners. Reimbursement concerns may negatively have an impact on doctors' recommendation of the HPV vaccine.
OBJECTIVE: Concerns have been raised about gynecologists as vaccinators. This survey evaluated use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, attitudes, and barriers among gynecologists and family practitioners for differences between the 2 specialties. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 50-item, self-administered questionnaire mailed to participants. SETTING: The study was conducted in Virginia through the University of Virginia Center for Survey Research. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to 500 family practitioners and 500 gynecologists. INTERVENTIONS: The questionnaire asked provider and practice demographics, vaccine practices, knowledge, HPV vaccine attitudes, and barriers to vaccination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared gynecologists to family practitioners for the outcome of offering HPV vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with providers choosing to offer and recommend the HPV vaccine. RESULTS: After exclusion of ineligible physicians, 385 of 790 doctors responded (48.7%). Seventy percent of family practitioners and 73.5% of gynecologists currently offer the HPV vaccine. There were no significant differences in demographics or practice patterns between the specialties. The most frequent barrier to vaccination reported by both groups was reimbursement. In multivariate logistic regression, inadequate reimbursement was negatively associated with offering the HPV vaccine (odds ratio [OR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-1.1) and with recommending the vaccine to patients (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.26-0.76). Experience treating HPV- related disease was positively associated with offering the HPV vaccine (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologists are providing HPV vaccination at rates similar to family practitioners. Reimbursement concerns may negatively have an impact on doctors' recommendation of the HPV vaccine.
Authors: Jocelyn M York; James L Klosky; Yanjun Chen; James A Connelly; Karen Wasilewski-Masker; Anna R Giuliano; Leslie L Robison; F Lennie Wong; Melissa M Hudson; Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Teri L Malo; Anna R Giuliano; Jessica A Kahn; Gregory D Zimet; Ji-Hyun Lee; Xiuhua Zhao; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Susan T Vadaparampil; Teri L Malo; Jessica A Kahn; Daniel A Salmon; Ji-Hyun Lee; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Richard G Roetzheim; Karen L Bruder; Tina M Proveaux; Xiuhua Zhao; Neal A Halsey; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Teri L Malo; Stephanie A S Staras; Shalanda A Bynum; Anna R Giuliano; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jennifer Tsui; Hector P Rodriguez; Gilbert C Gee; Loraine A Escobedo; Gerald F Kominski; Roshan Bastani Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Shalanda A Bynum; Stephanie A S Staras; Teri L Malo; Anna R Giuliano; Elizabeth Shenkman; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 5.012