Literature DB >> 21906816

Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: visual rehabilitation and graft survival rate.

Arundhati Anshu1, Marianne O Price, Francis W Price.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana.
METHODS: Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were ∼1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications.
RESULTS: The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17-95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2-3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range -0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (P=0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae (P=0.14), neovascularization (P=0.88), endothelial rejection (P=0.59), and number of prior PKs (P=0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21906816     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

1.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thabo Lapp; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Iris-claw, retropupillary-fixated, aphakic intraocular lens implantation for traumatic aphakia following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Anas A Anbari
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 3.  Endothelial keratoplasty versus repeat penetrating keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Tao Zhang; Yan Wei Kang; Jing Liang He; Shi-Ming Li; Shao-Wei Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Differential Survival of Penetrating and Lamellar Transplants in Management of Failed Corneal Grafts.

Authors:  Jonathan Aboshiha; Mark N A Jones; Cathy L Hopkinson; Daniel F P Larkin
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Outcome of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Abdulrahman S Khairallah
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Surgical management of spontaneous, late-onset Descemet membrane detachment after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a case report.

Authors:  Myrsini Petrelli; Konstantinos Oikonomakis; Konstantinos Andreanos; Andreas Mouchtouris; Ilias Georgalas; George Kymionis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-05

Review 7.  Risk Factors for Endothelial Decompensation after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Its Novel Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Mengyuan Liu; Jing Hong
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Population with American Corneas.

Authors:  Fang-Chi Hsiao; Po-Yuan Chen; Yaa-Jyuhn James Meir; Hsin-Yuan Tan; Ching-Hsi Hsiao; Hsin-Chiung Lin; David Hui-Kang Ma; Lung-Kun Yeh; Wei-Chi Wu; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Factors associated with graft survival and endothelial cell density after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Nobuhito Ishii; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Yazu; Yoshiyuki Satake; Akitoshi Yoshida; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Outcomes of complex Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty performed by cornea fellows.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Daubert; Terrence P O'Brien; Eldad Adler; Oriel Spierer
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.