UNLABELLED: Wildfire fighters are known to report to work in a hypohydrated state, which may compromise their work performance and health. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ingesting a bolus of fluid before the shift had any effect on firefighters' fluid consumption, core temperature, or the time they spent in high heart rate and work activity zones when fighting emergency wildfires. METHODS: Thirty-two firefighters were divided into non-bolus (AD) and pre-shift drinking bolus (PS, 500 ml water) groups. RESULTS: Firefighters began work hypohydrated as indicated by urine colour, specific gravity and plasma osmolality (P(osm)) results. Post-shift, firefighters were classified as euhydrated according to P(osm) and hypohydrated by urinary markers. No significant differences existed between the drinking groups in pre- or post-shift hydration status, total fluid intake, activity, heart rate or core temperature. CONCLUSION: Consuming a bolus of fluid, pre-shift provided no benefit over non-consumption as both groups had consumed equivalent ad libitum volumes of fluid, 2.5 h into the shift. No benefits of bolus consumption were observed in firefighter activity, heart rate response or core temperature response across the shift in the mild weather conditions experienced. Ad libitum drinking was adequate to facilitate rehydration in firefighters upon completion of their emergency firefighting work shift.
UNLABELLED: Wildfire fighters are known to report to work in a hypohydrated state, which may compromise their work performance and health. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ingesting a bolus of fluid before the shift had any effect on firefighters' fluid consumption, core temperature, or the time they spent in high heart rate and work activity zones when fighting emergency wildfires. METHODS: Thirty-two firefighters were divided into non-bolus (AD) and pre-shift drinking bolus (PS, 500 ml water) groups. RESULTS: Firefighters began work hypohydrated as indicated by urine colour, specific gravity and plasma osmolality (P(osm)) results. Post-shift, firefighters were classified as euhydrated according to P(osm) and hypohydrated by urinary markers. No significant differences existed between the drinking groups in pre- or post-shift hydration status, total fluid intake, activity, heart rate or core temperature. CONCLUSION: Consuming a bolus of fluid, pre-shift provided no benefit over non-consumption as both groups had consumed equivalent ad libitum volumes of fluid, 2.5 h into the shift. No benefits of bolus consumption were observed in firefighter activity, heart rate response or core temperature response across the shift in the mild weather conditions experienced. Ad libitum drinking was adequate to facilitate rehydration in firefighters upon completion of their emergency firefighting work shift.
Authors: Grace E Vincent; Sally Ferguson; Brianna Larsen; Nicola D Ridgers; Rod Snow; Brad Aisbett Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Stephanie E Chappel; Brad Aisbett; Grace E Vincent; Nicola D Ridgers Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Grace E Vincent; Brad Aisbett; Brianna Larsen; Nicola D Ridgers; Rod Snow; Sally A Ferguson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-02-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Caleb Leduc; Sabir I Giga; Ian J Fletcher; Michelle Young; Sandra C Dorman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah M Jay; Bradley P Smith; Samantha Windler; Jillian Dorrian; Sally A Ferguson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 3.390