Literature DB >> 21905878

Biosurveillance where it happens: state and local capabilities and needs.

Eric S Toner1, Jennifer B Nuzzo, Matthew Watson, Crystal Franco, Tara Kirk Sell, Anita Cicero, Thomas V Inglesby.   

Abstract

In recent years, improved biosurveillance has become a bipartisan national security priority. As has been pointed out by the National Biosurveillance Advisory Subcommittee and others, building a national biosurveillance enterprise requires having strong biosurveillance systems at the state and local levels, and additional policies are needed to strengthen their biosurveillance capabilities. Because of the foundational role that state and local health departments play in biosurveillance, we sought to determine to what extent state and local health departments have the right capabilities in place to provide the information needed to detect and manage an epidemic or public health emergency-both for state and local outbreak management and for reporting to federal agencies during national public health crises. We also sought to identify those policies or actions that would improve state and local biosurveillance and make recommendations to federal policymakers who are interested in improving national biosurveillance capabilities. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21905878     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  2 in total

1.  Malware and Disease: Lessons from Cyber Intelligence for Public Health Surveillance.

Authors:  Frank L Smith
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2016-08-26

2.  Implementation System of a Biosurveillance System in the Republic of Korea and Its Legal Ramifications.

Authors:  Amanda J Kim; Sangwoo Tak
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2019-12-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.