Literature DB >> 21905800

Neurocognitive function before and after surgery for insular gliomas.

Adam S Wu1, Mariana E Witgert, Frederick F Lang, Lianchun Xiao, B Nebiyou Bekele, Christina A Meyers, David Ferson, Jeffrey S Wefel.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Insular gliomas can be resected with acceptable rates of neurological morbidity, but little is known with regard to impairment of higher-order neurocognitive functions. The frequency and functional impact of neurocognitive deficits in patients with gliomas has until recently been underappreciated. The authors therefore examined neurocognitive function in patients with insular gliomas and compared the findings in this group to those in a matched control group of patients with gliomas in nearby brain regions.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients with WHO Grade II or III insular gliomas participated in neuropsychological evaluations before and after resection. To establish whether the pattern of neurocognitive performance was different from that of other patients with tumors in neighboring areas, patients with insular tumors were matched with control patients for age, educational level, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score, tumor side, grade, and volume. The control group comprised patients in whom gliomas had been resected from frontal, temporal, and parietal areas near the insula. Baseline pre- and postoperative neurocognitive test results were compared between and within groups.
RESULTS: Preoperative neurocognitive impairment was common in both insular and control groups. Patients with insular tumors had significantly worse preoperative performance on naming tests. In both groups, postoperative decline occurred in most neurocognitive domains. There were no statistically significant differences between patients in the insular and control groups with regard to rates of postoperative decline on any test. However, there were trends suggesting differential cognitive performance postoperatively, because patients with insular tumors were more likely to experience greater decline in learning and memory. Neurological morbidity was similar to prior rates reported in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Few statistically significant differences in cognitive function were observed between patients in the insular and control groups at either the pre- or postoperative evaluation, although there was a trend for patients with insular tumors to exhibit greater postoperative decline in learning and memory. Although technically more challenging, surgery for insular region glioma appears feasible without profound neurological or cognitive morbidity for many patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21905800     DOI: 10.3171/2011.8.JNS11488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  28 in total

1.  Neurocognitive Changes Associated With Surgical Resection of Left and Right Temporal Lobe Glioma.

Authors:  Kyle R Noll; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Mateo Ziu; Ronald J Benveniste; Dima Suki; Jeffrey S Wefel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Surgery of insular and paralimbic diffuse low-grade gliomas: technical considerations.

Authors:  Karine Michaud; Hugues Duffau
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Neurocognitive functioning and genetic variation in patients with primary brain tumours.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Wefel; Kyle R Noll; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Insular lobe surgery and cognitive impairment in gliomas operated with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Barbara Zarino; Martina Andrea Sirtori; Tommaso Meschini; Giulio Andrea Bertani; Manuela Caroli; Cristina Bana; Linda Borellini; Marco Locatelli; Giorgio Carrabba
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Cognitive outcome after awake surgery for tumors in language areas.

Authors:  B Santini; A Talacchi; G Squintani; F Casagrande; R Capasso; G Miceli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Recovery of empathetic function following resection of insular gliomas.

Authors:  Xingchao Wang; Xiaosi Gu; Jin Fan; Shiwei Wang; Fu Zhao; Patrick R Hof; Pinan Liu; Zhixian Gao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Alterations in Functional Connectomics Associated With Neurocognitive Changes Following Glioma Resection.

Authors:  Kyle R Noll; Henry S Chen; Jeffrey S Wefel; Vinodh A Kumar; Ping Hou; Sherise D Ferguson; Ganesh Rao; Jason M Johnson; Donald F Schomer; Dima Suki; Sujit S Prabhu; Ho-Ling Liu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Subgroup characteristics of insular low-grade glioma based on clinical and molecular analysis of 42 cases.

Authors:  Chao Tang; Zhen-yu Zhang; Ling-chao Chen; Zelin Sun; Yi Zhang; Zhiyong Qin; Yu Yao; Liang-fu Zhou
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Research on cognitive and sociocognitive functions in patients with brain tumours: a bibliometric analysis and visualization of the scientific landscape.

Authors:  Uwe Schlegel; Patrizia Thoma; Milena Pertz; Stoyan Popkirov
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  A valid alternative for in-person language assessments in brain tumor patients: feasibility and validity measures of the new TeleLanguage test.

Authors:  Elke De Witte; Vitória Piai; Garret Kurteff; Ruofan Cai; Peter Mariën; Nina Dronkers; Edward Chang; Mitchel Berger
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.