Literature DB >> 21905042

Comparison of electrocardiographic findings between the midventricular ballooning form and apical ballooning form of takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

Satoshi Kurisu1, Yasuko Kato, Naoya Mitsuba, Ken Ishibashi, Yoshihiro Dohi, Kenji Nishioka, Yasuki Kihara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several reports have recently described the variant form of takotsubo cardiomyopathy exhibiting midventricular ballooning. The purpose of this study was to assess electrocardiographic (ECG) findings on admission in patients with midventricular ballooning. HYPOTHESIS: ECG findings are different between the midventricular ballooning form and apical ballooning form of takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: We reviewed ECGs on admission in 6 patients with midventricular ballooning and 20 patients with apical ballooning. The sum of ST segment elevation in leads V1 to V3 or in leads V4 to V6 was obtained. The number of leads showing ST segment elevation and/or T wave inversion was also obtained. These ECG findings were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: In midventricular ballooning, ECG changes including ST segment elevation and/or T wave inversion were observed frequently in leads V2 and V3, and were not observed in leads II, III, -aVR, aVF, V5, and V6. On the other hand, in apical ballooning, they were found in all leads. They were most common in leads V4 and V5. The sum of ST segment elevation in leads V1 to V3 was similar (2.6 ± 2.0 mm vs 2.7 ± 2.0 mm, P = not significant), and the sum of ST segment elevation in leads V4 to V6 was significantly lower in midventricular ballooning than apical ballooning (0.4 ± 0.8 mm vs 3.5 ± 3.0 mm, P<0.05). The number of leads showing ST segment elevation and/or T wave inversion was significantly lower in midventricular ballooning than apical ballooning (3.2 ± 1.0 leads vs 6.3 ± 2.2 leads, P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that midventricular ballooning may show limited ECG changes despite broad wall motion abnormality.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21905042      PMCID: PMC6652286          DOI: 10.1002/clc.20934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  2 in total

1.  Can you interpret the ECG under stress?

Authors:  Ching-Hui Sia; Devinder Singh; Joshua Ping-Yun Loh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and midventricular Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a novel association?

Authors:  Rainer Schimpf; Jürgen Meinhardt; Martin Borggrefe; Dariush Haghi
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.