Literature DB >> 21904245

Physical demands of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football players during preseason training in the heat.

Julie K DeMartini1, Jessica L Martschinske, Douglas J Casa, Rebecca M Lopez, Matthew S Ganio, Steve M Walz, Eric E Coris.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate physical demands of football players during preseason practices in the heat. Furthermore, we sought to compare how physical demands differ between positions and playing status. Male National Collegiate Athletic Association Division 1 football players (n = 49) participated in 9 practice sessions (142 ± 16 minutes per session; wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) 28.75 ± 2.11°C) over 8 days. Heart rate (HR) and global positioning system data were recorded throughout the entirety of each practice to determine the distance covered (DC), velocity (V), maximal HR (HRmax), and average HR (HRavg). The subjects were divided into 2 groups: linemen (L) (N = 25; age: 22 ± 1 years, weight: 126 ± 16 kg, height: 190 ± 4 cm,) vs. nonlinemen (NL) (N = 24; age: 21 ± 1 years, weight: 91 ± 11 kg, height: 183 ± 8 cm) and starters (S) (N = 17; age: 21 ± 1 years, weight: 118 ± 21 kg, height: 190 ± 7 cm) vs. nonstarters (NS) (N = 32; age: 20 ± 1 years, weight: 105 ± 22 kg, height: 185 ± 7 cm) for statistical analysis. The DC (3,532 ± 943 vs. 2,573 ± 489 m; p = 0.001) and HRmax (201 ± 9 vs. 194 ± 11 b·min(-1); p = 0.025) were significantly greater in NL compared with that in L. In addition, NL spent more time (p < 0.0001) and covered more distance (p = 0.002) at higher velocities than L did. Differences between S vs. NS were observed (p = 0.008, p = 0.031), with S obtaining higher velocities than NS did. Given the demands of their playing positions, NL were required to cover more distance at higher velocities, resulting in a greater HRmax than that of L. Therefore, it appears that L engage in more isometric work than NL do. In addition, the players exposed to similar practice demands provide similar work output during preseason practice sessions regardless of their playing status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21904245     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318231a643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  Thermoregulation, Fluid Balance, and Sweat Losses in American Football Players.

Authors:  Jon K Davis; Lindsay B Baker; Kelly Barnes; Corey Ungaro; John Stofan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  A Narrative Review of the Physical Demands and Injury Incidence in American Football: Application of Current Knowledge and Practices in Workload Management.

Authors:  Toby Edwards; Tania Spiteri; Benjamin Piggott; G Gregory Haff; Christopher Joyce
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Physical Characteristics and Performance of Japanese Top-Level American Football Players.

Authors:  Daichi Yamashita; Masaki Asakura; Yoshihiko Ito; Shinzo Yamada; Yosuke Yamada
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Positional Differences in Pre-Season Scrimmage Performance of Division I Collegiate Football Players.

Authors:  Kate S Early; Nathan P Lemoine; Annie Simoneaux; Shelly Mullenix; Jack Marucci; Michael J MacLellan; Neil M Johannsen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Association Between Head Impact Biomechanics and Physical Load in College Football.

Authors:  Bradley J Lauck; Aaron M Sinnott; Adam W Kiefer; Darin A Padua; Jacob R Powell; Haley R Sledge; Jason P Mihalik
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.219

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.