Literature DB >> 21902995

A clinical study evaluating success of 2 commercially available preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns.

Rona Leith1, Anne C O'Connell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the success of posterior NuSmile(®) and Kinder™Krown and to determine the level of parental satisfaction with this treatment option.
METHODS: Forty-eight crowns were placed in 18 children with a mean age of 5 years. A split mouth design was used. Each participant randomly received each crown type on 2 or 4 pair matched molars. Two trained operators completed all treatments. Two additional trained and calibrated clinicians blindly re-evaluated crowns according to specified variables. A visual analogue scale was used to determine parental satisfaction. Examiner reliability was determined by Cohen's kappa scores and results were analysed statistically using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: All crowns were retained after 12 months with no statistical difference in the clinical and radiographic success of posterior NuSmile(®) and Kinder™Krowns. Overall success was high with 81% of facings intact and 83% free of gingival inflammation after 12 months. Radiographically, 81% were successful. Veneer facing wear was significantly more likely to occur with opposing crowns (P=.02). Parental satisfaction was excellent with a mean score of 9.3 out of 10.
CONCLUSIONS: These crowns combine the durability of conventional stainless steel crowns with improved esthetics and are proposed as a suitable alternative where esthetic demand is increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21902995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  10 in total

Review 1.  Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.

Authors:  Nicola P T Innes; David Ricketts; Lee Yee Chong; Alexander J Keightley; Thomas Lamont; Ruth M Santamaria
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-31

2.  Twenty-nine-month follow-up of a paediatric zirconia dental crown.

Authors:  Serena Lopez Cazaux; Isabelle Hyon; Tony Prud'homme; Sylvie Dajean Trutaud
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-14

3.  In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements.

Authors:  S N Al-Haj Ali; R I Farah
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-10-02

4.  Shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to preformed metal crowns for primary molars using a universal adhesive and two different surface treatments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  S S Patil; U R Kontham; A Kamath; R Kontham
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2016-07-13

5.  Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Stainless Steel Crowns Using Two Mechanical Surface Treatments and Two Bonding Systems.

Authors:  Sara Ghadimi; Alireza Heidari; Hamid Sarlak
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-01

6.  Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Serena Lopez-Cazaux; Elody Aiem; Ana Miriam Velly; Michèle Muller-Bolla
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements.

Authors:  Mona Sohrabi; Sara Ghadimi; Bahman Seraj
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-01-20

8.  Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars.

Authors:  Mebin George Mathew; Korishettar Basavaraj Roopa; Ashu Jagdish Soni; Md Muzammil Khan; Afreen Kauser
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-03-26

9.  Composite bonding to stainless steel crowns using a new universal bonding and single-bottle systems.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Hattan; Sharat Chandra Pani; Mohammad Alomari
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-04-02

Review 10.  Review on Preformed Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry-The Composition and Application.

Authors:  Klaudia Sztyler; Rafal J Wiglusz; Maciej Dobrzynski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.