Literature DB >> 21902923

Microbiological quality of water immersion-chilled and air-chilled broilers.

Lei Zhang1, Jong Y Jeong, Kishorekumar K Janardhanan, Elliot T Ryser, Iksoon Kang.   

Abstract

Carcass chilling during broiler processing is a critical step in preventing growth of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria. The objective of this study was to compare the microbiological quality of air- and water-chilled broiler carcasses processed at the same commercial facility. For each of four replications, 15 broilers were collected from the same commercial processing line after evisceration, after spraying with cetylpyridinium chloride (a cationic disinfectant), and after air chilling or water immersion chilling (WIC). All carcasses were quantitatively examined for mesophilic aerobic bacteria, Escherichia coli, coliforms, and Campylobacter as well as for the presence of Salmonella and Campylobacter. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were seen between air and water chilling for E. coli or coliforms or for the incidence of Salmonella and Campylobacter. Lower numbers of Campylobacter were recovered from WIC than from air-chilled carcasses (P < 0.05), but the incidence of Campylobacter on WIC carcasses was similar, suggesting that some Campylobacter organisms were injured rather than killed during WIC. In-line spraying with the disinfectant effectively decreased the incidence of Salmonella and Campylobacter on prechilled carcasses; however, cells presumably injured by the sanitizer recovered during chilling. Therefore, on-farm intervention strategies remain critically important in minimizing the spread of microbial contaminants during processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21902923     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  7 in total

1.  Spoilage Bacteria Counts on Broiler Meat at Different Stages of Commercial Poultry Processing Plants That Use Peracetic Acid.

Authors:  Hudson T Thames; Courtney A Fancher; Mary G Colvin; Mika McAnally; Emily Tucker; Li Zhang; Aaron S Kiess; Thu T N Dinh; Anuraj T Sukumaran
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Practical opportunities for microbiome analyses and bioinformatics in poultry processing.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Dana K Dittoe; Jessica A Brown; Dale R Thompson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Enhancement of bactericidal effects of sodium hypochlorite in chiller water with food additive grade calcium hydroxide.

Authors:  Chiharu Toyofuku; Md Shahin Alam; Masashi Yamada; Miyuki Komura; Mayuko Suzuki; Hakimullah Hakim; Natthanan Sangsriratanakul; Dany Shoham; Kazuaki Takehara
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 4.  Reviewing Interventions against Enterobacteriaceae in Broiler Processing: Using Old Techniques for Meeting the New Challenges of ESBL E. coli?

Authors:  Michaela Projahn; Ewa Pacholewicz; Evelyne Becker; Guido Correia-Carreira; Niels Bandick; Annemarie Kaesbohrer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Microbiome Profiles of Commercial Broilers Through Evisceration and Immersion Chilling During Poultry Slaughter and the Identification of Potential Indicator Microorganisms.

Authors:  John A Handley; Si Hong Park; Sun Ae Kim; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  The Effect of Sanitizers on Microbial Levels of Chicken Meat Collected from Commercial Processing Plants.

Authors:  Kapil Chousalkar; Sarah Sims; Andrea McWhorter; Samiullah Khan; Margaret Sexton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin.

Authors:  M K Seo; H L Jeong; S H Han; I Kang; S D Ha
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.