Literature DB >> 21902684

Impact of high-risk classification by FISH: an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) study E4A03.

Susanna J Jacobus1, Shaji Kumar, Hajime Uno, Scott A Van Wier, Greg J Ahmann, Kimberly J Henderson, Natalie S Callander, Michael E Williams, David S Siegel, Philip R Greipp, S Vincent Rajkumar, Rafael Fonseca.   

Abstract

Lenalidomide with dexamethasone is a standard induction treatment regimen for newly diagnosed myeloma (although a Federal Drug Administration indication is still absent). In the context of the Phase 3 clinical trial E4A03 (lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in low or high doses), we queried whether a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based genetic classification into high risk (HR) and standard risk (SR) multiple myeloma (MM) would remain clinically significant. Of 445 E4A03 patients, 126 had FISH analysis; 21 were classified HR with t(4;14), t(14;16), or 17p13 deletions. Median survival follow-up approached 3 years. Patients with FISH data tended to be younger and healthier compared to the rest of the study population and, consequently, had superior overall survival (OS) results. Within the FISH cohort, shorter OS in the HR versus SR group (P = 0·004) corresponded to a hazard ratio of 3·48 [95% confidence interval: (1·42-8·53)], an effect also observed in multivariate analysis. Two-year OS rates were 91% for SR MM and 76% for HR MM. There was also evidence of interaction between risk status and treatment (P = 0·026). HR patients were less likely to attain good partial response (SR 46% and HR 30%, Odds Ratio = 2·0 [0·7-5·6]), but overall response rates were not different. FISH-based risk classification retained prognostic significance in patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction. 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21902684      PMCID: PMC3192237          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08849.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  27 in total

1.  Once- versus twice-weekly bortezomib induction therapy with CyBorD in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Craig B Reeder; Donna E Reece; Vishal Kukreti; Christine Chen; Suzanne Trudel; Kristina Laumann; Joseph Hentz; Nicholas A Pirooz; Jesus G Piza; Rodger Tiedemann; Joseph R Mikhael; Peter L Bergsagel; Jose F Leis; Rafael Fonseca; Alexander K Stewart
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The molecular classification of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Fenghuang Zhan; Yongsheng Huang; Simona Colla; James P Stewart; Ichiro Hanamura; Sushil Gupta; Joshua Epstein; Shmuel Yaccoby; Jeffrey Sawyer; Bart Burington; Elias Anaissie; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Ronald Walker; Maurizio Zangari; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Clinical significance of TP53 mutation in myeloma.

Authors:  W J Chng; T Price-Troska; N Gonzalez-Paz; S Van Wier; S Jacobus; E Blood; K Henderson; M Oken; B Van Ness; P Greipp; S V Rajkumar; R Fonseca
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Michel Attal; Philippe Moreau; Catherine Charbonnel; Frédéric Garban; Cyrille Hulin; Serge Leyvraz; Mauricette Michallet; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Laurent Garderet; Gérald Marit; Lucienne Michaux; Laurent Voillat; Marc Renaud; Bernard Grosbois; Gaelle Guillerm; Lotfi Benboubker; Mathieu Monconduit; Catherine Thieblemont; Philippe Casassus; Denis Caillot; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Jean-Jacques Sotto; Marc Wetterwald; Charles Dumontet; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Isabelle Azais; Véronique Dorvaux; Marc Zandecki; Régis Bataille; Stéphane Minvielle; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Thierry Facon; Claire Mathiot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  B G M Durie; J-L Harousseau; J S Miguel; J Bladé; B Barlogie; K Anderson; M Gertz; M Dimopoulos; J Westin; P Sonneveld; H Ludwig; G Gahrton; M Beksac; J Crowley; A Belch; M Boccadaro; M Cavo; I Turesson; D Joshua; D Vesole; R Kyle; R Alexanian; G Tricot; M Attal; G Merlini; R Powles; P Richardson; K Shimizu; P Tosi; G Morgan; S V Rajkumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma based on Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-adapted Therapy (mSMART): consensus statement.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morie A Gertz; Rafael Fonseca; Martha Q Lacy; P Leif Bergsagel; Robert A Kyle; Philip R Greipp; Thomas E Witzig; Craig B Reeder; John A Lust; Stephen J Russell; Suzanne R Hayman; Vivek Roy; Shaji Kumar; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; A Keith Stewart
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1.

Authors:  John D Shaughnessy; Fenghuang Zhan; Bart E Burington; Yongsheng Huang; Simona Colla; Ichiro Hanamura; James P Stewart; Bob Kordsmeier; Christopher Randolph; David R Williams; Yan Xiao; Hongwei Xu; Joshua Epstein; Elias Anaissie; Somashekar G Krishna; Michele Cottler-Fox; Klaus Hollmig; Abid Mohiuddin; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Jeffrey Sawyer; Yazan Alsayed; Ronald Walker; Maurizio Zangari; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Bortezomib appears to overcome the poor prognosis conferred by chromosome 13 deletion in phase 2 and 3 trials.

Authors:  S Jagannath; P G Richardson; P Sonneveld; M W Schuster; D Irwin; E A Stadtmauer; T Facon; J-L Harousseau; J M Cowan; K C Anderson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Emily Blood; Montserrat Rue; David Harrington; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Brian Van Ness; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; Richard J Bailey; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant.

Authors:  J Bladé; D Samson; D Reece; J Apperley; B Björkstrand; G Gahrton; M Gertz; S Giralt; S Jagannath; D Vesole
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  12 in total

1.  Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; María-Victoria Mateos; Norma C Gutierrez; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Approach to the Older Adult With Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Roberto Mina; Sara Bringhen; Tanya M Wildes; Sonja Zweegman; Ashley E Rosko
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2019-05-17

Review 3.  Myeloma: management of the newly diagnosed high-risk patient.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

4.  Prognostic gene expression analysis in a retrospective, multinational cohort of 155 multiple myeloma patients treated outside clinical trials.

Authors:  Yan-Ting Chen; Erik T Valent; Erik H van Beers; Rowan Kuiper; Stefania Oliva; Torsten Haferlach; Wee-Joo Chng; Martin H van Vliet; Pieter Sonneveld; Alessandra Larocca
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.450

5.  Outcomes of primary refractory multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies.

Authors:  Neil Majithia; S Vincent Rajkumar; Martha Q Lacy; Francis K Buadi; Angela Dispenzieri; Morie A Gertz; Suzanne R Hayman; David Dingli; Prashant Kapoor; Lisa Hwa; John A Lust; Stephen J Russell; Ronald S Go; Robert A Kyle; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma-a practice guideline.

Authors:  C Chen; F Baldassarre; S Kanjeekal; J Herst; L Hicks; M Cheung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Saad Usmani; David Siegel; Kenneth C Anderson; Wee-Joo Chng; Philippe Moreau; Michel Attal; Robert A Kyle; Jo Caers; Jens Hillengass; Jesús San Miguel; Niels W C J van de Donk; Hermann Einsele; Joan Bladé; Brian G M Durie; Hartmut Goldschmidt; María-Victoria Mateos; Antonio Palumbo; Robert Orlowski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Clinical Utility of a Diagnostic Approach to Detect Genetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma: A Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  Hyun Ae Jung; Mi Ae Jang; Kihyun Kim; Sun Hee Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  Front-line therapies for elderly patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Herve Avet-Loiseau; Thierry Facon
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Proof of the concept to use a malignant B cell line drug screen strategy for identification and weight of melphalan resistance genes in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Martin Bøgsted; Anders E Bilgrau; Christopher P Wardell; Uta Bertsch; Alexander Schmitz; Julie S Bødker; Malene K Kjeldsen; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Gareth J Morgan; Karen Dybkaer; Hans E Johnsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.