Literature DB >> 21902676

A systematic review of the literature about competence and poor insight.

A M Ruissen1, G A M Widdershoven, G Meynen, T A Abma, A J L M van Balkom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Formally, incompetence implies that a patient cannot meet the legal requirements for informed consent. Our aim was to review the scientific literature on the relationship between competence and insight in patients with psychiatric disorders, how competence and insight are connected in these patients and whether there are differences in competence and insight among patients with different disorders.
METHOD: A search in PubMed/Medline was performed. Articles were assessed on relevance criteria by two independent reviewers. Study design, population, variables, and outcomes were extracted.
RESULTS: Seven articles were included on studies of psychiatric inpatients and outpatients and of psychotic and non-psychotic patients. All studies used the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool (MacCAT). All studies but one found a strong correlation between poor insight and incompetence. Psychotic patients with poor insight are very likely to be incompetent, and psychotic patients with adequate insight are generally competent. One well-executed study showed that in non-psychotic disorders, however, another relationship emerges; competence and insight do not completely overlap in these patients.
CONCLUSION: Most incompetent psychotic patients have poor insight, but non-psychotic patients with adequate insight were incompetent in a substantial number of cases. In sum: non-psychotic patients with adequate insight can be incompetent.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21902676     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01760.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  12 in total

1.  Desire for information of people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Domenico Giacco; Mario Luciano; Valeria Del Vecchio; Gaia Sampogna; Mike Slade; Eleanor Clarke; Marietta Nagy; Aniko Egerhazi; Povl Munk-Jørgensen; Malene Frøkjaer Krogsgaard Bording; Wolfram Kawohl; Wulf Rössler; Nadja Zentner; Bernd Puschner; Andrea Fiorillo
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Moving Perspectives on Patient Competence: A Naturalistic Case Study in Psychiatry.

Authors:  A M Ruissen; T A Abma; A J L M Van Balkom; G Meynen; G A M Widdershoven
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-03

3.  Individualized prediction of three- and six-year outcomes of psychosis in a longitudinal multicenter study: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Jessica de Nijs; Thijs J Burger; Ronald J Janssen; Seyed Mostafa Kia; Daniël P J van Opstal; Mariken B de Koning; Lieuwe de Haan; Wiepke Cahn; Hugo G Schnack
Journal:  NPJ Schizophr       Date:  2021-07-02

4.  Medical patients' treatment decision making capacity: a report from a general hospital in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Bilanakis; Aikaterini Vratsista; Eleni Athanasiou; Dimitris Niakas; Vaios Peritogiannis
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2014-11-26

5.  A meta-review of literature reviews assessing the capacity of patients with severe mental disorders to make decisions about their healthcare.

Authors:  A Calcedo-Barba; A Fructuoso; J Martinez-Raga; S Paz; M Sánchez de Carmona; E Vicens
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment Decision: Correlates of Competence in Schizophrenia Patients.

Authors:  Özlem Erden Aki; Sertaç Ak; Emre Mutlu; Ahmet Alp Karakaşli; Şeref Can Gürel
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.339

7.  Decisional capacity in young people with first episode psychosis, major depressive disorder and no mental disorder.

Authors:  Chiara M J Killey; Kelly Allott; Sarah Whitson; Shona M Francey; Christina Bryant; Magenta B Simmons
Journal:  Schizophr Res Cogn       Date:  2021-12-08

8.  The Greek version of the MacArthur competence assessment tool for treatment: reliability and validity. Evaluation of capacity for treatment decisions in Greek psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Nikolaos Bilanakis; Aikaterini Vratsista; Georgios Kalampokis; Georgios Papamichael; Vaios Peritogiannis
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  How psychotherapists handle treatment errors -- an ethical analysis.

Authors:  Irina Medau; Ralf J Jox; Stella Reiter-Theil
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Mental health professionals' experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Espen W Haugom; Bjørn Stensrud; Gro Beston; Torleif Ruud; Anne S Landheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.