OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of the Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale (A-WPTAS) in the assessment of acute cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: Data previously collected from 82 mTBI and 88 control participants using the Revised Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale (R-WPTAS) was converted to A-WPTAS scores and pass/fail classifications were calculated for both scales. RESULTS: The proportion of failures on the R-WPTAS and the A-WPTAS did not differ and a similar number of mTBIs were classified on each. For mTBIs the relationship between the independent memory test and a pass/fail classification was the same for both scales. Bivariate logistic regressions revealed that mTBIs, relative to controls, were around 8 times more likely to fail the assessment (R-WPTAS: 95% CI: 3.70-18.87; A-WPTAS: 95% CI: 3.70-20.14). As verbal learning improved the likelihood of failure was reduced. Greater education was associated with a decreased likelihood of failure. The relationship between education and a fail performance was not sustained when education was adjusted for the effect of age, prior mTBI, blood alcohol level, injury status, verbal learning, and morphine administration. CONCLUSIONS: The A-WPTAS is a valid measure. The A-WPTAS may reduce the risk of failing to classify patients with mTBI by identifying and documenting acute cognitive impairment.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of the Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale (A-WPTAS) in the assessment of acute cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: Data previously collected from 82 mTBI and 88 control participants using the Revised Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale (R-WPTAS) was converted to A-WPTAS scores and pass/fail classifications were calculated for both scales. RESULTS: The proportion of failures on the R-WPTAS and the A-WPTAS did not differ and a similar number of mTBIs were classified on each. For mTBIs the relationship between the independent memory test and a pass/fail classification was the same for both scales. Bivariate logistic regressions revealed that mTBIs, relative to controls, were around 8 times more likely to fail the assessment (R-WPTAS: 95% CI: 3.70-18.87; A-WPTAS: 95% CI: 3.70-20.14). As verbal learning improved the likelihood of failure was reduced. Greater education was associated with a decreased likelihood of failure. The relationship between education and a fail performance was not sustained when education was adjusted for the effect of age, prior mTBI, blood alcohol level, injury status, verbal learning, and morphine administration. CONCLUSIONS: The A-WPTAS is a valid measure. The A-WPTAS may reduce the risk of failing to classify patients with mTBI by identifying and documenting acute cognitive impairment.
Authors: Ilaria Pozzato; Ian D Cameron; Susanne Meares; Annette Kifley; Kim Van Vu; Anthony Liang; Mark Gillett; Ashley Craig; Bamini Gopinath Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Marije Bosch; Joanne E McKenzie; Jennie L Ponsford; Simon Turner; Marisa Chau; Emma J Tavender; Jonathan C Knott; Russell L Gruen; Jill J Francis; Sue E Brennan; Andrew Pearce; Denise A O'Connor; Duncan Mortimer; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Susanne Meares; Tracy Smyth; Susan Michie; Sally E Green Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Ilaria Pozzato; Susanne Meares; Annette Kifley; Ashley Craig; Mark Gillett; Kim Van Vu; Anthony Liang; Ian Cameron; Bamini Gopinath Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Olli Tenovuo; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Lee E Goldstein; David J Sharp; Joukje van der Naalt; Nathan D Zasler Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Marije Bosch; Joanne E McKenzie; Duncan Mortimer; Emma J Tavender; Jill J Francis; Sue E Brennan; Jonathan C Knott; Jennie L Ponsford; Andrew Pearce; Denise A O'Connor; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Russell L Gruen; Sally E Green Journal: Trials Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 2.279